Could we consider changing the process? Any of these things would help: 1) A dev build where almost all pull requests are accepted, and which is the accepted starting point for new features. (The production build is a subset of those branches) 2) More reviewers/people with permission to accept pull requests for the prod build 3) Lower standard required to accept pull requests.
I completely understood the urgency of working on the purge process. Starting a whole new editor project? Not so much. Steve On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Richard Fairhurst <rich...@systemed.net> wrote: > On 17/07/2012 04:30, Steve Bennett wrote: >> >> https://github.com/systemed/potlatch2/pull/33 >> https://github.com/systemed/potlatch2/pull/36 >> https://github.com/systemed/potlatch2/pull/49 >> https://github.com/systemed/potlatch2/pull/66 >> >> Seriously, now. These slow review times, and blocking pull requests >> for trivial reasons ("I'm not a great fan of the digger", "[I] want to >> check first whether it can be done without try... catch") are total >> motivation killers. > > > Yeah, I know. Mea culpa. I've been ridiculously busy recently due to, > basically, changing jobs and another project. I'm hoping to get a chance > asap. > > Richard > > > _______________________________________________ > Potlatch-dev mailing list > Potlatch-dev@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/potlatch-dev _______________________________________________ Potlatch-dev mailing list Potlatch-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/potlatch-dev
