Hi Alfonso, I've tried swapping the location before and you're right, it
makes no difference.

Can you let me know which version of pound you're running?

Thanks,
 --Cameron



On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Alfonso Espitia <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> My config looks like your original one, except that the session stuff
> was after the "backend" directive, instead of before.  I doubt that will
> make a difference, but maybe someone else knows.
>
> --Alfonso
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cam
> Roberts
> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 5:15 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Pound Mailing List] load is not balanced when session
> handling
>
> Thanks for the response,  The site is actually live so the traffic is
> coming in from all over the place.
>
> I was thinking along the same lines and actually ignored the lopsided
> effect during my testing for exactly this reason, I assumed since all
> the load was coming from a handful of test servers I wasn't seeing
> realistic production behaviour.  However the problem continued after we
> went "live" with it.
>
> Thanks,
>  --Cam Roberts
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Alfonso Espitia <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Are you trying this from a different location?
> >
> > If you try to hit it from the same location, it will direct you to the
>
> > same server (because you ARE coming from the same IP).
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cam
> > Roberts
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 4:06 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [Pound Mailing List] load is not balanced when session
> > handling
> >
> > Hi,
> >   I've configured pound with two BackEnds and Session Type IP, TTL
> 300.
> >
> > However all the load goes to one of the back end servers, I never see
> > an apache connection on the other until the "primary" goes down.  I'm
> > not using Emergency, and if I comment out the Session block the load
> > is balanced evenly between the two servers.
> >
> >
> > Relevant portion of my pound.cfg:
> >
> >        Service
> >                BackEnd
> >                        Address 10.0.0.2
> >                        Port    80
> >                End
> >                Session
> >                        Type IP
> >                        TTL 300
> >                End
> >        End
> >        Service
> >                BackEnd
> >                        Address 10.0.0.4
> >                        Port    80
> >                End
> >                Session
> >                        Type IP
> >                        TTL 300
> >                End
> >        End
> >
> >
> > Originally I had:
> >
> >        Service
> >                Session
> >                        Type IP
> >                        TTL 300
> >                End
> >                BackEnd
> >                        Address 10.0.0.2
> >                        Port    80
> >                End
> >                BackEnd
> >                        Address 10.0.0.4
> >                        Port    80
> >                End
> >        End
> >
> > The behaviour seems to be identical with both of the above
> > configurations, it doesn't do any load balancing when Session is
> > declared.
> >
> > From my understanding of the manpage load should still be balanced
> > when session handling is used, individual users will be bound to a
> > single server but it should alternate with each new connection.  Am I
> > misunderstanding session handling?
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > --Cameron Roberts
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions.
> >
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
> > SecureMail, and is believed to be clean.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions.
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions.
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
> SecureMail, and is believed to be clean.
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions.
>


--
To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions.

Reply via email to