Clusters/Macros: As someone who has 25+ backends per service and 6-7 services, 
this would be very nice.  I would also anticipate this would not be difficult 
to implement.

Joe

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jacob Anderson [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 11:53 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Pound Mailing List] Pound 2.7
> 
> +1 on the cluster/macro idea. Yeah, that's a really good 2.7 idea. I
> could really use that and get rid of my m4 templates.
> 
> -- jake
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Todd Freeman [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 8:35 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [Pound Mailing List] Pound 2.7
> >
> > I'll second the "config reload" going around...
> >
> > I would also add a request to be able to define clusters or such of
> > servers....
> >
> > An example of this would be like:
> >
> > Cluster
> >          Name PROD
> >          BackEnd
> >                  Address 192.168.1.20
> >                  Port 80
> >          End
> >
> >          BackEnd
> >                  Address 192.168.1.21
> >                  Port 80
> >          End
> > End
> >
> > Cluster
> >          Name TEST
> >          BackEnd
> >                  Address 192.168.1.22
> >                  Port 80
> >          End
> >
> >          BackEnd
> >                  Address 192.168.1.23
> >                  Port 80
> >          End
> > End
> >
> > ... later in the config file ...
> >
> > Service
> >          URL "^/something.*"
> >          HeadRequire     "Host:.*blah.something.edu.*"
> >          BackEndCluster PROD
> > End
> >
> > Service
> >          URL "^/bork.*"
> >          HeadRequire     "Host:.*bork.something.edu.*"
> >          BackEndCluster PROD
> > End
> >
> > Service
> >          URL "^/.*"
> >          HeadRequire     "Host:.*foo.edu.*"
> >          BackEndCluster TEST
> >
> >          BackEnd
> >                  Address 192.168.1.26
> >                  Port 80
> >          End
> >          # Would end up sending to 1.22 1.23 and 1.26 (cluster +
> local
> > defined)
> > End
> >
> >
> >
> > etc.. etc...
> >
> >
> > That would make maintaining backend server pools/clusters VASTLY
> easier.
> >
> > Thanks for considering!
> >
> > On 12/30/2011 09:44 AM, Robert Segall wrote:
> > > Hallo everybody
> > >
> > > New year, new version: we declare open the wish-list for 2.7
> features.
> > > Please reply to this with your list of enhancements/patches/wishes.
> > >
> > > Please feel also free to offer comments (supportive or not, as the
> > case
> > > may be) on items that others may post. The more support for a
> > > feature, the better its chances of making it into 2.7.
> > >
> > > Please do NOT post patches in reply - a short description is quite
> > > enough. You can mail me directly if you want to offer patches.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Todd Freeman  Ext 6103                   .^.    Don't fear the
> penguins!
> > Programming Department                   /V\
> > Andrews University                      // \\
> http://www.linux.org/
> > http://www.andrews.edu/~freeman/       /(   )\
> http://www.debian.org/
> >                                          ^^ ^^
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to
> [email protected].
> > Please contact [email protected] for questions.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to
> [email protected].
> Please contact [email protected] for questions.

Reply via email to