I just setup a pacemaker cluster recently and wrote about it, might save you some time if you go that route.
http://techdenovo.blogspot.com/2013/03/clustering-with-drbd-pacemaker-centos.html Jonathan Galentine Chief Technology Officer 7900 Westpark Dr, Ste A50, McLean, VA 22102 Office: (703) 891-0131 x304 | Fax: (703) 891-0129 [email protected] | www.ntiva.com -----Original Message----- From: Joe Gooch [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 9:45 AM To: '[email protected]' Subject: RE: [Pound Mailing List] Pound Failover I have two boxes, set ip_nonlocal_bind, each one runs pound all the time, and corosync/pacemaker moves the ip between them. So pound is always running but it only receives requests when the cluster makes the server active. Joe > -----Original Message----- > From: James Bensley [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 7:08 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Pound Mailing List] Pound Failover > > Hi All, > > How are people achieving fail-over with Pound, in the event the server > becomes unavailable? > > I am thinking of something like keepalived to use VRRP to fail-over to > a second box if the first one fails (so they share the same public > IP), > > OR > > IPVS, again to share the same public. > > However, I haven't had a chance to lab up either scenario yet. Are > people using either of the scenarios, which do they prefer? Or if you > are doing something else, what are you doing, how is it working out > for you? > > I am primarily after active/passive fail-over, active/active is a > luxury extra. > > Many thanks, > James. > > -- > To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to > [email protected]. > Please contact [email protected] for questions. -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to [email protected]. Please contact [email protected] for questions. -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to [email protected]. Please contact [email protected] for questions.
