> Hallo Simon > > I believe there is a cmake3 package on RHEL which would give you the > version you need. Alternately you could modify > > cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.0) > > to read > > cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.7) > > in CMakeLists.txt. I think this should work as I am not aware of using > any 3.0-specific features.
OK, I'll try this. > > As to nanomsg/mbedtls I repeat my question: should we include a copy in > the distribution? Maybe not. Looks like both are also in EPEL repo and we should just use them. Thanks, Simon > > On Mon, 2021-01-25 at 13:25 +0100, Simon Matter via pound wrote: >> Hi Robert and all, >> >> I tried to build on CentOS7 / RHEL7 and quickly saw that I'm not >> coming far. >> >> $ cd build >> $ cmake .. >> CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:13 (cmake_minimum_required): >> CMake 3.0 or higher is required. You are running version 2.8.12.2 >> >> Then, there is a nanomsg RPM in EPEL for RHEL7 but none for RHEL8. >> For >> mbedtls, it is also only in the EPEL repository, not in the >> distribution >> itself. >> >> Depending on something from EPEL is usually not something I like >> because >> EPEL is a moving target and if a maintainer doesn't continue to work >> on a >> package, it is removed from EPEL. >> >> So, for RHEL, it's a bit difficult to build RPMs for Pound 3. >> >> Regards, >> Simon >> >> > Hallo Simon and other responders >> > >> > I really wonder, what dependencies were so difficult to find: I >> > would >> > very much like to make your life easier, but I would need some more >> > details. >> > >> > The idea was to supply the stuff which is not normally available in >> > distributions (hpack, uthash) even if it can be obtained from the >> > web. >> > I believe nanomsg and mbedtls are commonly available in >> > distributions >> > (and certainly can be downloaded), but I am quite willing to >> > include >> > them in future distributions if you think it would help. >> > >> > I am also curious what versioning problems you ran into - I don't >> > think >> > pound requires any specific version, please correct me if I am >> > wrong. >> > >> > On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 20:55 +0100, Simon Matter via pound wrote: >> > > > Hallo everybody >> > > > >> > > > Pound v3.0 has been officially released in early November. We >> > > > would >> > > > really appreciate if you could drop a few lines regarding your >> > > > experience with it: how has it behaved in your case, is it >> > > > reliable, >> > > > did you do any performance testing, have you run into any >> > > > issues. >> > > > >> > > > Suggestions for new features in 3.1 are also welcome. >> > > >> > > Hi Robert, >> > > >> > > The problem I had with the new release is mainly that there are >> > > new >> > > dependencies and system requirements which are not easily met in >> > > our >> > > environment. I have provided RPMs of Pound in the past but didn't >> > > have the >> > > time yet to upgrade. I hope to do it in near future. >> > > >> > > Regards, >> > > Simon >> > -- >> > Robert Segall >> > Apsis GmbH >> > Postfach, Uetikon am See, CH-8707 >> > Tel: +41-32-512 30 19 >> > >> > >> > -- >> > pound mailing list >> > pound@apsis.ch >> > https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/pound_apsis.ch >> > >> >> > -- > Robert Segall > Apsis GmbH > Postfach, Uetikon am See, CH-8707 > Tel: +41-32-512 30 19 > > > -- > pound mailing list > pound@apsis.ch > https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/pound_apsis.ch > -- pound mailing list pound@apsis.ch https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/pound_apsis.ch
