> Doesn't seem dumb to me. > call() would be very similar to do() > except it is only used to call script files. > > I think that is better than adding exceptions and complications > to the current syntax: [EMAIL PROTECTED](args) > > In your example call above, is "test" meant to be the @label?
It turns out that call was implementable with less than 5 lines of code so I did that. The @ is part of path to the script, so if you wanted to have a variable entry hold the entry point, you could use call (path++"@"++entry, arg1, arg2, ...) ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Check out the new improvements in Yahoo! Groups email. http://us.click.yahoo.com/6pRQfA/fOaOAA/yQLSAA/JV_rlB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Attention: PowerPro's Web site has moved: http://www.ppro.org Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/power-pro/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
