--- In [email protected], "swzoh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah, I see. Thanks. I don't have this file, better to > download it. I've got the entire 6.7 package. I find the interlinked html docs helpful (but I really should put them in a chm because searching would be easier) and have referred to the source code a few times. It is easy to get confused tracing through (some of what I thought about pcrecpp apparently came from a different test function). > BTW, do you need dfa function? I omitted a few > including it which I thought might not be needed in my > personal opinion. I suppose you can do it yourself by > generalizing pcre_exec, just adding two more arguments > that are similar to those of oVector. However, if you > meet a problem in doing it, let me know. > > And, please keep in mind that I made the wrapper > functions using pointers if possible. Being aware of it > could be of help in some cases. > > Sean At some point I might play with the dfa functions but "need" is a strong word :D When we get a plugin I wouldn't want anything deliberately excluded (except possibly the ones that start with underscores?) even if the higher level pcrecpp functions also get included. Thanks for the pointer tip. I don't yet understand the significance of it though. Regards, Sheri
