constructor
> > of pcrecpp fails and I set error string. I should delete the re
> > object that is created when I set the error message. Probably not
> > going to happen that much.
>
> I'll probably upload another version anyway (with the above bugfix)
so
> you can send me updated code if you want... or just tell me exactly
what
> I should change (I still haven't read the rest of code ;-).
if (!re || message.length()>0)
{
**szargs=0;
if (re) //add this
delete re; // and this
}
If you use allow "" as an argument, then the plugin will pass a string
but the stored value will not be kept because AssignToVar ignores empty
strings.
So, you are right, there is no need to set n by a loop. YOur idea is
better.
Do you know why you pcrecpp.dll is 800k instead of around 300K like the
ones availabe on the net?
>
