> Have to trust the original script didn't try to make a Function with a > bad name choice. I presume you disallow Function statements where the > name is a reserved word (but haven't tested).
No, but you won't be able to define a function with an internal function name, as the internal name take precedence. > I presume you are doing this to get higher performance in scripts, but still be able to edit them in files. I'd be interested in some time comparisons for a few scripts. Nothing else should be using CPU on the system when you test (and I'd still average over 2-3 trials).
