--- In [email protected], "Derek" <delwo...@...> wrote:
> > I can either 
> > 
> >   (1) new plugin could convert every powerpro ANSI string 
> >       to unicode; any scripts now using autoit plugin should work 
> >       unchanged
> >       
> >   (2) new plugin could expect only handles to unicode strings 
> >       generated by unicode plugin; less wrok for me, but would
> >       require user to get and master unicode plugin, and change
> >       existing scripts
> > 
> >   (3) new plugin could check for handles to unicode strings;
> >       if found, process, otherwise assume standard ANSI string and
> >       convert to unicode.  This is most work for me.

> > Any preferences?

> I would prefer aption 2 as:

>      (1)  I dont want you to have to work too hard

OTOH keeps me off streets and out of trouble.

>      (2)  We users of you (free) efforts shouldnt mind working a bit  ourselvs

Just depends if there's anyone wedded to autoit who doesn;t want to learn yet 
another plugin.

But I suspect anyone far enough gone to know about autoit and be writing pp 
scripts probably not much bothered by how many plugins they use.

> My only request would be that the time you saved on just doing option 2 - 
> well in that case could you spend a little time including a simple text file 
> with a bit of help + example?

Huh.  Though there was an example already in the plugin distro.
Just checked.  There is.  Okay, if that's not enough, how about you make up 
another one, or a more complicated one, and I'll chuck it in with next version.

Docs: for most point automatically generated by Perl script from the autoit 
header file.  I assume from that jumping off point you'd go back to the autoit 
dll docs E.g. AutoItX.chm in 
C:\Program Files\AutoIt3\AutoItX.

Hmm.  Now there's a point (he said having just bothred to read some of 
AutoItX.chm).  In addition to a C/C++ interface,
AutoItX3.dll provides a COM interface to exactly the same functions.
So in principle I could forget updating autoit plugin, and everyone could just 
use the COM interface instead.  What about that?




Reply via email to