On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:24:07 -0700 Kristen Carlson Accardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:13:19 -0700 > Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Török Edvin wrote: > > > On 6/11/07, Kristen Carlson Accardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > - > > >> > > >> I've updated the hardware based patches and posted to the mailing list - > > >> they do indeed save anywhere from .6-1.5 watts depending on the system, > > >> on my X60 they save about a watt. I don't think that a hardware based > > >> solution is irrelevant at all - it will usually be able to make faster > > >> and more accurrate decisions about when to place the link into lower > > >> power state than software could. > > >> > > > > > > Is there any chance non-AHCI chipsets will be supported too in the > > > future? Like an Intel ICH7-M... > > > > I thought ICH7M did support ahci... but maybe I'm very wrong there... > > > > It does - regular ICH7 does not, but ICH7M does. > > Oops - I mean regular ICH7 does not support ALPM... it does support AHCI. Kristen _______________________________________________ Power mailing list [email protected] http://www.bughost.org/mailman/listinfo/power
