On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 8:02 PM, William Lovaton <[email protected]> wrote: > > --- El mié 14-ene-09, Andika Triwidada <[email protected]> escribió: >> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Erik Andrén >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > 2009/1/13 Arjan van de Ven >> <[email protected]>:
<snip> >> >> unfortunately there is no efficient way to do >> this; what is there actually ends up burning you more >> power........ >> >> >> >> we need to fix the scheduler instead for sure. >> >> >> > >> > Is there a kernel bug entry open for this issue? >> >> Yup >> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5471 > > > Mmmm... I don't think that's the bug. It talks about one core being unable > to sleep when the other core is offline. > > We need a bug report about the process scheduler. Is there any? > Well, my interpretation of this thread [1] was those two thing are related http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/7/4 CMIIW -- andika _______________________________________________ Power mailing list [email protected] http://www.bughost.org/mailman/listinfo/power
