On Saturday 27 June 2009 00:36:58 Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 12:31:25AM +0200, Alberto Gonzalez wrote: > > I agree that it might be better to just set power/level to auto if > > power/autosuspend is already > 0. In my case at least this would work > > quite well (except that I have to click to wake up the mouse, which > > becomes uncomfortable), while if you set power/autosuspend to 0 the mouse > > remains dead. My default for power/autosuspend is 2. > > "0" means "autosuspend immediately when the reference count hits 0", not > "disable autosuspend". The kernel defaults to 2 for this value, which > means "wait 2 seconds after the reference count hits 0 and then > autosuspend if it's still 0". The idea is to provide a certain level of > debounce.
Ah, so a value of 0 would probably work fine if my mouse would wake up on movement, right? But since for now it requires clicking, the apparent result is that it never wakes up (it probably just goes back to sleep too fast, so I would have to click continually to keep it awake and be able to use it). _______________________________________________ Power mailing list [email protected] http://www.bughost.org/mailman/listinfo/power
