On 1/5/2011 8:12 PM, Ian Kumlien wrote: > Hi, > > As you see in the comment, I don't know if this is something beyond > cosmetics - but i always start fiddling with things like this... > > I also have to admit that C++ never was my forte, so i think you're on > your own for that "total_stamp" being uninitialized problem. > You could treat it as a struct and do a memset with a known offsetof or > so, or just handle it C++ style.
unfortunately your email client has line wrapped the patch ;-( the total_stamp uninitialized maybe (just a hunch) can be if tracepoints do not work at all.... would like to see the kernel config to see if I miss a check for some config option (and if this is 32 bit powertop on a 64 bit kernel that'll be fun as well I suspect) _______________________________________________ Power mailing list [email protected] http://www.bughost.org/mailman/listinfo/power
