>>Yeah, interesting that the 5300 is probably a lot of folks' '2nd Mac' -
>>because they're a cheap PPC portable that do most everyday things fairly
>>well. Hope they're all running SpeedDoubler though. Seriously.
>
>I tried Speed Doubler on a 5300 runnning system 8.6 and found NO benefit
>and the underlined menus were annoying. I removed it.
>Am I missing an amazing feature? Please, what benefit is Speed Doubler with
>system 8.6, which is almost all native?
Paul Fuchs on comp.sys.mac.portables has run some speed tests with the 
5300 + SD 8. MacWorld originally did with SD 1.x in 1995. I've also done 
some tests, although not to the extent Paul has. Paul tested Finder 
functions with a stopwatch w/  w/o SD 8, as well as apps such as Word, 
Excel, Netscape etc.

Paul found that SD 8 doubled the speed of most application launches (or 
close to 2x) or, in some Finder functions, even trebled performance. This 
is absolutely beyond dispute. This is esp. so in non-native apps like 
Word 5.1 - launching it was painful until I got SD (48 hours after I 
bought the 5300). Without SD, screen redraws on a 5300 (or a 1400/117) 
are abysmally slow. If you can't see any difference, you clearly need a 
faster PowerBook. If you don't like underlined menus, switch it off.

OS 8.5 is only 54% PPC native. 8.6 is a little more, but not much. Use I 
Love Native, just as a basic guide to which CPs & extensions are not 
native. Such as:
- Extensions manager
- Trackpad
- CD/DVD driver
- Photo access
- Audio CD access
- File Sharing extension
- iTunes QT extension
- QT Java extras (QT 5.2)

Of course, these are not as important as 68K assembly code embedded in 
the system suitcase and the Finder. Every time the system makes a call to 
something that has(or requires) 68K code, there's a consequential 
slowdown. It may be only nanoseconds, but there's stuff that Apple simply 
can't take out. As a result, the system overhead is higher than it might 
be and, thus, the OS is not as fast as it might be with a given CPU. 

The process manager did not go native until OS 9; the file manager was 
not native until OS 9. While OS 8 introduced improved disc caching, 
rendering SD's scheme unnecessary, the SD emulator emulates a 68040, 
whereas the Apple emulator in ROM only emulates a 68020 (mostly for 
backward compatibility). 

Cheers,

RD

Remy Davison
Contributing Editor, Insanely-Great Mac <http://www.insanely-great.com>
mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
RD's PowerBook page: <http://www.macpowerbook.com>



-- 
PowerBooks is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...

 Small Dog Electronics    http://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives |
 -- Enter to win a FREE Titanium G4 PowerBook! -- |  & CDRWs on Sale!  |

          Save on Mac software -- Shop Software Outlet.com
           <http://lowendmac.com/ad/software.outlet.html>

Star Trek Collection: Movies 1-7 on VideoCD, $38.88 from CoolVCD
<http://lowendmac.com/ad/coolvcd.html>
- - - - -
PowerBooks list info:   <http://lowendmac.com/lists/powerbooks.shtml>
Send list messages to:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/powerbooks%40mail.maclaunch.com/>

Using a Macintosh? Get free email and more at Applelinks! 
<http://www.applelinks.com>

Reply via email to