A-NO-NE Music ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 2005-10-07 23:58 said: >Sean McBride / 2005/10/06 / 06:52 PM wrote: > >>I'm afraid I can't agree... the list is public, isn't it? And public >>means, well, public. :) > >What is the definition of public here? If the list do not allow non >registered member to post, how come it is public? If I knew the list >archive is open to public, and whatever I post here can be access from >anyone outside of this list members then I have a problem.
To become a list member, you need only a valid email address. That pretty much makes it public IMHO. >>Well, that's a google bug then, not an argument against having a list >>archive. > >I don't know why you eliminated the portion of my original post that you >quoted, where I said I also admin a user group which archive is only >available to members, and that's what I want. Any reason you didn't >respond to that portion? I guess simply because I haven't followed this thread closely; my apologies, I was not trying to evasive or anything. I'm not opposed to list archives being members-only, nor am I opposed to them being public. I don't even care if email addresses are censored or not, though I agree it's probably better to censor them. Sean
