You're stating the obvious. End of discussion. Mikael Byström wrote on 8/13/05:
>H.R. Riggs said: > >>This is potentially pretty naive from a business perspective. Any >>producer that does not listen to customer feedback is not going to be in >>business for the long haul. Given the amount of these discussions on >>this list, I assume CTM monitors it to aggregate customer opinions. >>However, if they do not then all this discussion is indeed a waste of >>time, and hopefully they have another mechanism to accomplish this. If >>that is the case, then it would be nice to let everyone know. >Of course our collective opinion is important for CTM, but we don't >decide for them. > >You totally miss the point, which was that we users should not try and >*tell* CTM what to do or not and in what order. We don't get to decide, >see. We could instead focus on the why, that is why certain features >should be implemented or not. If we can communicate this in a structured >and civil fashion to CTM by means of this list and otherwise, then CTM >can decide and we've had our input. >Obviously CTM monitors this list and also takes part in discussions from >time to time, but features and changes should be implemented, or not >implemented, out of their respective merits as regarded by CTM (where the >users voices is only one factor) and not because 1 or 10 people on this >list says so. > > > >PM 5.2.1 | OS X 10.3.9 | Powerbook G4/400 | 768 MB RAM | 30 GB HD > >
