listes wrote:
>> Okay, I changed mine now also from ALL to ANY - is this new that it
>> should be ANY ?
>
>no, I think by doing this you just skip the "is not in previous"
>testing. On my side I *inverted* this last setting: indeed my setup is
>ALL / from/send not in address / is in previous : apparently idiot, but
>I feel this "not in previous" menu text does the contrary of what it
>says...
I think that "is in previous recipients" and "is not in previous
recipients" works as expected.
I also think that you should use "all conditions".
If you use "any condition", all messages will be passed to SpamSieve,
except when the sender in both in your address book AND in your recipient
history AND the message is addressed using your real name. That is
typically too restrictive.
>Try it: with just "not in address" alone, it will work, with "not in
>previous" alone, it won't.
Probably because this sender is in your address book, but you have never
sent a message to this address in PM 5 (the "previous recipients" list
did not exist in PM 4)?
Jérôme - PowerMail Engineering
---------------------------------------------------------------------
"I am generally delighted with PowerMail, which has the elegance and
attention to detail of the very best Macintosh software."
PowerMail user comment
Download a demo version from www.ctmdev.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
