Marlyse,

Here's how my filters look. First filter is "SpamSieve - Move if Spam"
then all my other filters get hits and if the message would be sent to
another folder instead of the "Spam" folder. I've seen an increase in
Spam to Yahoo message lists. The very last filter is essentially the same
as the first filter. I call "SpamSieve -Move if Spam". Now anything that
SpamSieve thinks is spam will go to the Spam folder. Yes this is
redundant and my alter your corpus, all my spam does go the the Spam
folder now. You should be able to use your modified version of the
SpamSieve script to do this with. I think it should work. I haven't
looked into the possibility of creating a script to see if a message is
labeled as spam already and then act upon it in this fashion. I will when
I get the time to see if it works. If so it should be easily adaptable to
both situations.

-- 
Andy Fragen

On Thu, Feb 5, 2004, Marlyse Comte said:

>
>hi andy -
>
>which kind of extra filter at the bottom of my filters? 
>
>I had setup an extra filter below spamsieve but it's not working,
>thinking this should do the trick. your message now implies that I had
>been looking in the right direction, just executed something wrongly.
>
>what I am trying to figure out is how do I make a filter to apply only if
>it is labeled spam (see my earlier question today on this list), how do i
>have to setup the IF condition in this lower filter? 
>
>I set my IF condition now (as I didn't know any better) to "any field
>contains SPAM" or "other field 'label' is SPAM" to do the double move
>(first to trash and then to the spam folder) but obviously this doesn't
>work and does not detect a labeled message. I assume the "other field"
>checks header info and not such stuff like labels. so this is a no-go.
>
>I do not know how to write AppleScripts - unfortunately
>
>---marlyse
>
>
>--------------- former message(s) quotes: ----------------
>
>>Marlyse,
>>
>>Add an extra filter to bottom of your filters. Then execute your modified
>>version of the SpamSieve script. I do this to move all labeled spam to
>>the spam folder. Otherwise it will end up in other folders depending on
>>the filters that follow.
>>
>>Alternatively, you could write an AppleScript that checks to the spam
>>label of the message and if labeled as spam then do the moving. Again,
>>make this the last filter in sequence.
>>
>>See if that works.
>>
>>-- 
>>Andy Fragen
>>
>>On Thu, Feb 5, 2004, Marlyse Comte said:
>>
>>>
>>>yes it works - but - don't do it ;-)
>>>
>>>I had to find out over the course of the day yesterday, that now all,
>>>even good messages, get treated the same way - this because the filter is
>>>an ALWAYS condition (thanks Michael Tsai). I do have this filter way at
>>>the bottom of my filter list and many of my messages have been already
>>>correctly filtered and stored, but there are still enough messages coming
>>>down to the SpamSieve filter to make this a non usable approach. Sorry
>>>for putting you onto a wrong track.
>>>
>>>This is the reason I was tampering a little around for another solution
>>>and asked on this list if it is somehow possible to apply a filter to
>>>only messages which have been labeled (e.g. spam).
>>>
>>>---marlyse
>>>
>>>
>>>--------------- former message(s) quotes: ----------------
>>>
>>>>On 19:27 CST, Tue, Feb 3, 2004, Marlyse Comte wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>you could just add 2 lines to your filter in PM:
>>>>>
>>>>>first filter is the one from SpamSieve which puts it into it's own spam
>>>>>folder (execute apple script). 
>>>>>
>>>>>then the next one is 'move message to trash'" and then the next one "move
>>>>>message to folder spam".
>>>>>
>>>>>this will have the message not show up in the recent window but remain
>>>>>bold in the spam folder.
>>>>>
>>>>>I just tested it here and this works here.
>>>>
>>>>Well, that was embarrassingly easy. Thanks. 
>>>>
>>>>Evan
>>>>
>>>>>--------------- former message(s) quotes: ----------------
>>>>>
>>>>>>On 10:14 CST, Thu, May 1, 2003, Michael Tsai wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Wednesday, April 30, 2003, at 10:43  AM, Bob Parks wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I know I can set up the script to file the spam in the "Mail Trash", 
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> then it does not show up in recent mail, but that clutters my trash
>>>>>>>> folder (which I occasionally have to pull messages out of), with
 spam
>>>>>>>> that I dont want.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Per Rick's suggestion to move the message twice, please try changing:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> move m to message container spamFolderName
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>in the script to:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> move m to message container "Mail Trash"
>>>>>>> move m to message container spamFolderName
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Has anyone gotten this to work - I've been trying to keep SpamSieve-
>>>>>>tagged spam from showing up in the Recent Mail browser, and supposedly
>>>>>>making this change to SpamSieve's "Move Mail" script will move it to the
>>>>>>trash, thus taking it out of the Recent browser, then move it to
the Spam
>>>>>>folder (I do want things to go into the Spam folder - every couple of
>>>>>>weeks I go through it to see if anything inadvertently got tagged
as spam
>>>>>>before deleting all spam). But properly properly identified and labelled
>>>>>>spam is still showing up in the Recent browser. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I've checked w/ Michael Tsai, SpamSieve's author, and he's stumped. Has
>>>>>>anyone come up with an alternate way of doing this? 
>>>>
>>>>-- 
>>>>Scientists at the Centers for Disease Control and Symantec's AntiVirus
>>>>Research Center today confirmed that foot-and-mouth disease cannot be
>>>>spread by Microsoft's Outlook email application, believed to be the first
>>>> time the program has ever failed to propagate a major virus.  
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>


Reply via email to