If you'd been following the thread, actually reading all, this question would never have come to mind. But the answer is: Of course not. That's the very thing that I've NEVER had to deal with before, and trying to prevent from occurring. Keep in mind, all these communications I've sent to this group were made in PM. Any and all weirdness viewed in these emails is strictly the fault of PM not allowing me to type my emails as I have elsewhere for many years.
Many things I'm quite willing to learn the new concepts and conventions as I get adjusted to the new climate in Macland. But having my emails look like "that" or end up completely random because of having to bow to some preset whim of a program wishing to do my thinking for me is unacceptable. That "toe the line and do as I have set forth for you to do" attitude is exactly why I left the Microsoft world behind. I don't need to simply find it again in only slightly different facade. And I don't "claim" anything. I merely state as I know it to be. ht ////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ On 11/23/03, david.gordon wrote: >tass wrote on Sun 23 Nov 2003 at 01:59 -0700 > >>I really didn't mean to get you, or anyone else hot about the collar. >>Initially, >>I just asked a simple question about a long standing feature that's widely > >I've come back from a weekend away to too much of this! > >Tass, did you claim you are writing emails with line breaks where you >want them so readers see exactly what you want them to see formatting >wise. Am I correct? So did you really type the above quote as shown here? >"Initially," line break/ new line, "I just asked...". Pardon my criticism >of your style but why the new line after just one word? > >And later > >>to be able to send a nice letter that, should it be printed, will look >>like the >>letter I typed? >>When did freedom become such a hateful concept? :-) > >Do you really format your emails with only two words on a line? And >that's the way you wanted me to see your mail? > >Just wondering... > >-- >david.gordon > > >
