You are correct Wayne, but it does do better than saving as text or anything else at the moment. ;)
-- Andy Fragen On Tue, Nov 11, 2003, Wayne Brissette said: >Andy Fragen [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tuesday, November 11, 2003 stated: > > >>This actually should be possible with a script to get 'the content of >>msg'. I've been looking to create a simple script to do this but haven't >>quite gotten around to it. I'll try to do it today and post it here. >> > > >Not really! What you end up with is the source of the message, but >EXCLUDING any attachments. When you view source on an email it's like >reading it in ELM, or Mail in UNIX. You end up with the binary attached >as well. So, this is not the exact same thing.
