>As for SpamSieve, I'm looking at providing some >special options for HTML messages. What exactly do you mean by "proven >innocent"? Do you mean that there should be a different cutoff for HTML >messages so that the slightest bit of spamminess can tip the scale?
No deep meaning there at all Mr. Tsai, I would probably skim titles myself on those mails branded suspicious simply for being HTML. Of course the best way would be to make the calculation based on the contents of the HTML *and* the fact that it was HTML. Once in a while, clueless users of Microsoft products do send simple text messages as HTML, and it would be doubly-nifty if those could sneak through due to their innocent nature, but I realize that's asking a lot. Overall you've created an awesome product that effectively addresses a modern scourge, and I'm sure I speak for scores of people here when I say I also appreciate your responsiveness. All that, and it even comes with an up-to-date manual! --- Scott T. Hards President HobbyLink Japan (www.hlj.com)
