If you want notification of when email arrives and set a schedule, you
can hear the chime (preferences - notifications) in OS 9, even with
PowerMail hidden while you are working in other applications if you set
the volume loud enough.

While I can understand your hold out, I will tell you that my oldest son
(an Engineering PhD student) told me 2 weeks ago that I could have saved
myself a lot of grief if I had been all OS X. After using macs for my
livelihoold for 18 years with NO problems that could not be easily
recovered, I had a crash in the middle of some work that was not
recoverable. I was not at home, had Tech Tools and Disk Warrior cds with
me, but could not recover. When I finally got things sorted out, Excel
had crashed and the time stamps on the Excel file, application and
systems folder were all the same. I had to reinstall from scratch OS 9
(fortunately I saved a lot to my OS X partition) and am still
reinstalling software. Software that ran fine before the crash required
upgrades, reinstallation, etc. It cost me 4 days and a 3 week delay in
payment for some work. (I know 4 days in 18 years isn't bad, but it
wasn't pleasant.) As soon as I finish this project, I will shift to OS X.
Almost all the software I use is OS X now. 

Midi

Bill caused electrons to sail in cyberspace with:

>Comment from new user of PM:
>
>Am a system 9.2 holdout...  Running beige G3/ 448 mgs ram, add-on usb,
>firewire etc., I push
>huge art files around and send them worldwide, do loads of emailing to my
>established
>customers and prospects... a few hundred contacts a week... also use
>Photoshop, Graphic
>Converter, MS Office, Filemaker, etc., daily and am on the machine
>constantly and email an
>integral part of my work and Netscape has been fine (v 4.79).
>
>Am just not seeing point of X's bells & whistle, and ditto newer re all
>Netscape design
>changes since 4.79, but lately occasionally Communicator browser doesn't
>work for me anymore
>with new web sites...  so am considering dump of Netscape and a switch to
>PM to run with IE
>5.1. and now trying PM.  Accordingly spent many hours sheparding over a
>gig of large email
>records into PM and have been fiddling with it all day...  but now think
>I may be coming
>down with a sever case of buyer's remorse.
>
>Just now realizing how much more I had with Netscape 4.79... PM doesn't
>allow linking of
>regular mail text to urls or to email addresses within mail, doesn't
>notify when messages
>arrive or even regularly the check server for me without an add-on... 
>And it seems kinda
>clunky overall compared to Netscape.  Maybe I'm just a creature of habit
>but am really
>wondering what the point of PM is.  I have plenty room for Netscape and
>IE in my machine, so
>am really beginning to think I'm better off as is.
>
>Can anyone show me where I'm wrong here?
>
>BillB
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Larry Samberg wrote:
>
>> Yeh, I was a bit leary of this, initially, since most of the mailers I
>> have been using for the last few years could display HTML...but the globe
>> at the bottom makes it pretty easy and the reality is that my browser can
>> display HTML faster and more consistently than most mailers....So I find
>> that I really don't miss it...
>>
>> /lss
>>
>> --
>> Larry S. Samberg         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> VM/Fax: 508-861-0261
>>
>> "The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal
>vigilance;
>> which condition if he break, servitude is at once the consequence of his
>> crime,
>> and the punishment of his guilt."
>> John Philpot Curran
>>
>> On Sat, 3 May 2003 20:57:57 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> >On 5/3/03, at 8:29 PM, Barbara Needham wrote:
>> >
>> >>Then you can click on the globe
>> >>icon at the bottom if you wish to see what the html mail really looked
>> >>like. Mostly its not worth it but every once in a while I get an email I
>> >>want to see the original of.
>> >
>> >I didn't know about the globe thing.  That's slick.  Thanks.
>> >
>> >Fred
>
>
>


Reply via email to