Michael Tsai sez: >Yes, using those criteria could cause some messages not to be >evaluated (in which case there would be no "Predicted" entries in the >log for them). I'm not sure what you mean about messages being marked >as good automatically.
I probably didn't communicate that well. As an example, this was in my log: ===================================================================== Predicted: Good (27) Subject: dark side reap revenge From: "side" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Identifier: khgtBI64xZPSBNTAr+Nhqw== Reason: P(spam)=0.000[0.500], bias=0.000, authoring(0.002), attackers (0.002), attackers(0.002), nur(0.002), nur(0.002), authoring(0.002), alban(0.002), shivers(0.998), mozart(0.002), shivers(0.998), chronology (0.998), chronology(0.998), S:dark(0.998), mozart(0.002), alban(0.002) Date: 2007-01-29 15:05:02 -0500 ===================================================================== Trained: Good (Auto) Subject: dark side reap revenge Identifier: khgtBI64xZPSBNTAr+Nhqw== Actions: added rule <From (address) Is Equal to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"> to SpamSieve whitelist, added to Good corpus (1950) Date: 2007-01-29 15:05:02 -0500 ===================================================================== So, it was predicting this as good, and training it as good (auto). I think that's the "Learning" function under Training preferences kicking in? Then I'd click "Mark as Spam" and this would show up in the log: ===================================================================== Trained: Spam (Manual) Subject: dark side reap revenge Identifier: khgtBI64xZPSBNTAr+Nhqw== Actions: disabled rule <From (address) Is Equal to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"> in SpamSieve whitelist, added rule <From (address) Is Equal to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"> to SpamSieve blocklist, added to Spam corpus (2813), removed from Good corpus (1949) Date: 2007-01-29 15:52:14 -0500 ===================================================================== Mistake: False Negative Subject: dark side reap revenge Identifier: khgtBI64xZPSBNTAr+Nhqw== Classifier: Bayesian Score: 27 Date: 2007-01-29 15:52:19 -0500 ===================================================================== The other setting was leaving spam which actually had my address in them. As an example, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not in my addressbook, so those usually got sent to spam just fine... The "Always" setting appears to be catching the others now, too. -- Michael Lewis Off Balance Productions [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.offbalance.com
