On   Saturday, August 23, 2008,   Michael J. Hußmann   sent forth:

>Tim Lapin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>> Exactly what I and others have written.
>
>This thread started with the question:
>
>> Do anyone here have clue on what possible reasons there could be to
>> choosing to send HTML-only messages, instead of mixed messages without a
>> pure text part as well?
>
>Then the thread got hijacked and now you are complaining about the well-
>known issue of PM being unable to make multiple HTML parts into
>something it can display. It might have been better to start a new
>thread if you want to discuss this (although I don't think anything has
>changed since Jérôme explained CTM's take the issue on 6/20/2008).
>
>- Michael
>
>
>Michael J. Hußmann
>
>E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>WWW (personal): http://michael-hussmann.de
>WWW (professional): http://digicam-experts.de
>
>

Ah, my mistake.  Apologies.  I have a summer head cold and clearly, I am
not reading things carefully enough.

As to the original question, I don't know, given that such messages are
more likely to be considered spam.

--
Tim Lapin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Intel iMac    OS 10.5.1    PowerMail 5.6.1     1 GB RAM     250 GB HD


Reply via email to