Am/On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:17:16 +0000 schrieb/wrote Derry Thompson: >Jeremy Hughes at [EMAIL PROTECTED] said on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:50:19 +0000 > >> >>That is a major disappointment to me :( >> >>I currently have to compact the database twice a week to avoid this limit. >> >>Not sure how long I can continue using PowerMail... > >You might be missing this feature.
No I didn't miss that one, but we could do that before. What they added is just a "Macro" for doing so automatically. > >Instead of multiplying risks with bigger and bigger databases, PowerMail >works around the 2GB database limit by enabling the archiving and >splitting into several smaller indexable message corpuses. I don't see the point. Where is the risk? Any bigger SQL database is handling gigabytes of data since years. There is a problem, but no risk. The problem is called time machine. all the best Matthias
