On Jan 16, 2010, at 10:20 AM, Michael J. Hußmann wrote: > Anyway, if Apple Mail was the yardstick against all other mail clients > were to be measured, why would anyone be using something else? I for one > am glad there are alternatives to Apple Mail. PM could surely be > improved, but making it more like Apple Mail is not what I would call an > improvement. > > - Michael
I agree. While I have switched to Apple Mail for the time being, and I agree PowerMail could use some new doodads, I don't think making it show all HTML mail stuff is good -- at least without options/preferences for some heavy customization of what is and isn't shown. I've stayed on the list because I do like PowerMail and want to watch what is happening with it. I hope it remains an alternative to HTML/styled email (which I still hate despite going to Apple Mail to deal with some mail I get now :( ), with enough HTML capability to make several users happy, but the ability to turn it off in bits and pieces as needed by others like me. -- Michael Lewis mich...@offbalance.com
