Reading the EPRI guidance that is the way I interpret it.  The procedure TVA 
uses, has us count everything that is 100 cpm or greater.  We do document a 
survey inside and outside the clothing.  That information is then available for 
a dose calculation if needed.  

 

The level is determined by the highest reading we find, regardless if it is 
causing skin dose or not.  You could have thousands of counts on the sole of a 
shoe before you would ever get any skin dose from it.

 

This is one of the challenges of benchmarking PCE numbers from different sites 
as the criteria can vary in what is counted.

 

 

Chuck Creamer

Charles E. Creamer

Health Physicist

Tennessee Valley Authority

Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant

P.O. Box 2000 (Mail Stop NAB-1G-BFN)

Decatur, Al. 35609-2000

Phone: 256-729-2983

Fax:  256-729-3101  

Pager: 1-800-323-4853, pin 30-053

mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 

 

 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
[email protected]
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2010 10:48 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Powernet: PCE Question

 

Friends, 

Do you look for >100 ncpm on the inside of clothing before classifying a 
clothing PCE as Level 1?  Been recommended to me that EPRI guidance (excerpted 
below) is interpreted as suggesting that approach at some benchmark plants.   


The determination of the EPRI PCE level classification should be based on a 
frisker reading of the 
skin or the highest reading on clothing. For skin contaminations, a frisker 
reading should be the 
maximum reading with the frisker held approximately ½ inch away from the 
affected skin. For 
clothing, the frisker reading should be on the inside of the clothing with the 
detector faced away 
from the skin. 
                                                                EPRI 
"Guidelines for Industry Response to Personnel Contaminations Rev 1" 


thank you, 


Mark Lewis
Health Physics Division Manager
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (D1N) 
Work:  (949) 368-1140 
[email protected] 

Reply via email to