From my perspective there are at least three considerations included in the 
EPRI PCE Guidelines. 1) tracking of contamination on personnel as it relates to 
the overall station contamination control program i.e. where, how & why 2) risk 
(skin dose) as reflected in Level 1,2,3 PCEs and 3) industry consistency 
(benchmarking) in counting and reporting PCEs.

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Thomas J Vandermey
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 8:49 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Powernet: PCE Question

OK I'm glad we all agree but that doesn't mean that our PCE classifications 
bear any relationship to importance or risk significance.  Why couldn't we have 
Level 1 begin at 1000 ccpm on shoes, 500 ccpm on external clothing, 200 ccpm on 
skin, and 100 ccpm on the face?  Wouldn't that make more sense?

Tom VanderMey, CHP
Principal Radiological Engineer
DTE Energy, Fermi 2
734-586-1539

[email protected] wrote: -----
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
From: "Williams, Dane R. (INPO)" <[email protected]>
Sent by: [email protected]
Date: 10/19/2010 08:17AM
Subject: RE: Powernet: PCE Question
I’m glad you’re clearing this up with the industry.  Another point to make, in 
case it comes up, is that the industry agreed with these definitions – so 
wasn’t just INPO coming up with the definitions.

Dane R. Williams, CHP
Organizational Effectiveness Team Leader
Institute of Nuclear Power Operations
[email protected]
770.644.8882

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
cindy connelly
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 8:14 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Powernet: PCE Question

INPO position:
It is still a level 1 PCE if inside of the clothing is less than level 1 
criteria but outside meets level 1.  This is very important to provide 
consisitency in reporting/trending of the additional indicators. These are the 
definitions from the Data Element Manual.

Total Contaminated Personnel 8.4.1


This is a unit level data element. Data is entered for each unit at a station. 
The number of occurrences in each month in which an individual was contaminated 
(≥100 cpm above background) on skin, clothing or modesty garments. This is a 
count of the number of logged occurrences (Action Level 1, 2, and 3) in 
accordance with EPRI guidance.


Refueling Outage Contaminated Personnel 8.4.2


This is a unit level data element. Data is entered for each unit at a station. 
The number of occurrences during a refueling outage in which an individual was 
contaminated (≥100 cpm above background) on skin, clothing or modesty garments. 
This is a count of the number of logged occurrences (Action Level 1, 2, and 3) 
in accordance with EPRI guidance.

In months in which no refueling outage has occurred the value field should be 
left blank with a status of "Final".

If you have any questions, please give us a call.  770-644-8839.
Thank you,
Cindy

________________________________
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sun, October 17, 2010 11:48:17 AM
Subject: Powernet: PCE Question

Friends,

Do you look for >100 ncpm on the inside of clothing before classifying a 
clothing PCE as Level 1?  Been recommended to me that EPRI guidance (excerpted 
below) is interpreted as suggesting that approach at some benchmark plants.


The determination of the EPRI PCE level classification should be based on a 
frisker reading of the
skin or the highest reading on clothing. For skin contaminations, a frisker 
reading should be the
maximum reading with the frisker held approximately ½ inch away from the 
affected skin. For
clothing, the frisker reading should be on the inside of the clothing with the 
detector faced away
from the skin.
                                                                EPRI 
“Guidelines for Industry Response to Personnel Contaminations Rev 1”


thank you,


Mark Lewis
Health Physics Division Manager
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (D1N)
Work:  (949) 368-1140
[email protected]


________________________________
.DISCLAIMER:
This e-mail and any of its attachments may contain proprietary INPO or WANO 
information that is privileged, confidential, or protected by copyright 
belonging to INPO or WANO. This e-mail is intended solely for the use of the 
individual or entity for which it is intended. If you are not the intended 
recipient of this e-mail, any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action 
taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this e-mail is contrary 
to the rights of INPO or WANO and is prohibited. If you are not the intended 
recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail 
and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout of this e-mail and 
any attachments.
Thank you.

Reply via email to