Salem Station also uses no detectable by smear and 2K ccpm fixed for "hot" tool 
room storage.  Special storage for items with higher values: i.e. tag, bag, 
etc..

________________________________
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Earls, Leonard
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 6:21 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: Powernet: Limits on contamination for hot tools?

STP uses 2000 ncpm on a standard frisker fixed contamination, no detectable by 
smear.  No limit for tool monitor, total activity.

Regards,
Leonard Earls
361-972-7759

________________________________
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
[email protected]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 17:18
To: [email protected]
Subject: Powernet: Limits on contamination for hot tools?

This question has probably been asked and answered before but I'm wondering 
what you'all use for acceptable limits for contamination on hot tools (not 
those specifically designated for containment).  I assume no detectable 
smearable (< 1k dpm/100 cm2) but how about fixed?  5k dpm/probe area?  Any 
specific criteria for what total activity the tool exhibits if placed in a SAM? 
 Such as 20 nCi (~50k dpm)?

Thanks, Eric (San Onofre HP Tech Support)


Eric M. Goldin, CHP
Southern California Edison
<[email protected]> ----------------------------------- Powernet - a service 
of the Health Physics Society Power Reactor Section Powernet archives at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Reply to: [email protected] If 
Questions, contact Mike Russell, CHP at [email protected]



-----------------------------------------
The information contained in this e-mail, including any
attachment(s), is intended solely for use by the named
addressee(s).  If you are not the intended recipient, or a person
designated as responsible for delivering such messages to the
intended recipient, you are not authorized to disclose, copy,
distribute or retain this message, in whole or in part, without
written authorization from PSEG.  This e-mail may contain
proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you have
received this message in error, please notify the sender
immediately. This notice is included in all e-mail messages leaving
PSEG.  Thank you for your cooperation.

Reply via email to