Watts Bar uses <1000 dpm/100 cm2  and < 4500 ccpm direct frisk.

 

Raymond Rouse

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Johns, Alex M.
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 2:25 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Powernet: Limits on contamination for hot tools?

 

Salem Station also uses no detectable by smear and 2K ccpm fixed for
"hot" tool room storage.  Special storage for items with higher values:
i.e. tag, bag, etc..

 

________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Earls, Leonard
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 6:21 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: Powernet: Limits on contamination for hot tools?

 

STP uses 2000 ncpm on a standard frisker fixed contamination, no
detectable by smear.  No limit for tool monitor, total activity.

 

Regards,

Leonard Earls

361-972-7759

 

________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of [email protected]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 17:18
To: [email protected]
Subject: Powernet: Limits on contamination for hot tools?

 

This question has probably been asked and answered before but I'm
wondering what you'all use for acceptable limits for contamination on
hot tools (not those specifically designated for containment).  I assume
no detectable smearable (< 1k dpm/100 cm2) but how about fixed?  5k
dpm/probe area?  Any specific criteria for what total activity the tool
exhibits if placed in a SAM?  Such as 20 nCi (~50k dpm)?   

Thanks, Eric (San Onofre HP Tech Support) 


Eric M. Goldin, CHP
Southern California Edison
<[email protected]> ----------------------------------- Powernet - a
service of the Health Physics Society Power Reactor Section Powernet
archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Reply to:
[email protected] If Questions, contact Mike Russell, CHP at
[email protected] 

________________________________

The information contained in this e-mail, including any attachment(s),
is intended solely for use by the named addressee(s). If you are not the
intended recipient, or a person designated as responsible for delivering
such messages to the intended recipient, you are not authorized to
disclose, copy, distribute or retain this message, in whole or in part,
without written authorization from PSEG. This e-mail may contain
proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you have
received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately.
This notice is included in all e-mail messages leaving PSEG. Thank you
for your cooperation. 

Reply via email to