From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Huneycutt, Scott Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2011 1:39 PM To: '[email protected]' Cc: Huneycutt, Scott Subject: Powernet: period TLD-ED dose discrepancy criteria
There are recommendations and criteria for performing investigations when an individual's TLD or DRD period results are greater than 100 mrem and differ by more than 25%. Does your site have an acceptance criteria for total period dose for the site? YES What difference between total site TLD and Estimated dose is considered unacceptable? When an individual's TLD(OSL) or DRD(DMC2000S) period results are greater than 50 mrem and differ by more than 25% or 100 mrem between TLD or DRD. AND we review all total estimated neutron dose >30 mrem with the reported CR-39 mrem dose. If so, what is the basis for your criteria? Thank you, Scott Huneycutt Xcel Energy | Responsible By Nature Senior Health Physicist Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant 2807 West County Road 75, Monticello, MN 55362 P: 763.295.1380 F: 763.295.1225 E: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> ________________________________________________ XCELENERGY.COM<http://www.xcelenergy.com/> Please consider the environment before printing this email Confidentiality Notice: This email message, including any attachments, contains or may contain confidential information intended only for the addressee. If you are not an intended recipient of this message, be advised that any reading, dissemination, forwarding, printing, copying or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply message and delete this email message and any attachments from your system.
