Hi, If I think I understand your question, the answer for Diablo Canyon is yes, but only informally.
As part of my review of the ED-TLD comparisons for each wear period I also look at the aggregate total period dose and ensure that it is reasonable compared to previous periods. I also plot all data and that information is also very useful for total system health purposes. Linda Linda M. Sewell, CHP Principal Health Physicist Pacific Gas & Electric Company Diablo Canyon Power Plant MS 119/1/117 PO Box 56 Avila Beach, CA 93424 P: 805.545.4315 | F: 805.545.2618| [email protected] From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Huneycutt, Scott Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2011 11:39 AM To: '[email protected]' Cc: Huneycutt, Scott Subject: Powernet: period TLD-ED dose discrepancy criteria There are recommendations and criteria for performing investigations when an individual's TLD or DRD period results are greater than 100 mrem and differ by more than 25%. Does your site have an acceptance criteria for total period dose for the site? What difference between total site TLD and Estimated dose is considered unacceptable? If so, what is the basis for your criteria? Thank you, Scott Huneycutt Xcel Energy | Responsible By Nature Senior Health Physicist Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant 2807 West County Road 75, Monticello, MN 55362 P: 763.295.1380 F: 763.295.1225 E: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> ________________________________________________ XCELENERGY.COM<http://www.xcelenergy.com/> Please consider the environment before printing this email
