Martin Bochnig wrote: >>1) A patch against that same tree. This is quick and trivial to do and >>will take pretty much no effort. From there, it's just a matter of >>merging it in and syncing it back into the trunk. It's not against the >>latest OpenSolaris bits, but merging them together shouldn't be too >>bad... and that's something the Polaris project should have someone >>responsible for going forward. This at least has the advantage that we >>have it in subversion from the get go. >> >>2) A tarball of our whole tree as we have it right now. That also isn't >>against the latest OpenSolaris builds, and someone will have to do the >>merging work. > > I personally would prefer options 1) and 2) together, if possible. > But that's just my personal opinion - a suggestion.
Sure, that's easy enough. I'll plan for them both.
