Cyril Plisko wrote: > On 6/7/06, Joshua Uziel <joshua.uziel at sun.com> wrote: > First of all that is great - frankly speaking I started to fear we'll never > see the actual source ;-)
Tsk tsk... ye of little faith... ;) > As for the form of the code - why don't you just create your own branch > in svn and work out of it ? That way it will be easier for everyone, > yourself included. It allows you to move at your own pace and > merge when you ready and feel comfortable. > > Speaking more generally - Polaris source base would most probably > move to mercurial together with the ON consolidation. So depending > on what time frame you are targeting for source contribution you > may or may not want to invest into Subversion. > > Failing all these - the option no. 1 from your list appears sane at most > to me. Frankly, I think things would be simple enough to just work on the one main tree. Perhaps merge this patch with your branch and then shlep it into the trunk or the like. Then we'll just all work out of the Polaris trunk until it's time to make a move to mercurial. We want to get things out to you guys as soon as we possibly can... hopefully within a week or two. > Right, I used to do it, but was quite too busy during last couple of > months :( It takes diligence... that's for sure. > Why ? svn.genunix.org works fine and the only change I envision > is to migrate to Mercurial when the time comes. Yep, like I said, we're flexible... per Martin's suggestion, we'll patch your branch and send a tarball.
