Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> Thomas Renninger wrote:
>
>>This is your area, go ahead ...
>>Has anyone already measured how much CPU load these messages produce?
>>Could this get a problem?
>
> After some discussion with the local DBus guru we came to the conclusion
> that if this causes problems, DBus is seriously broken anyway.
> I mean - we are talking about less than one event per second usually, so
> it should not ever be a problem - at least not more than the old way was.
> And we in fact lose some complexity since we now can have "anonymous"
> clients that don't cause overhead in the daemon since he does not need
> to know about them (those applets that just want to display some battery
> status can just listen to the broadcasts).
>
OK.
This get_states(..) wrapper causing X DBus readings, caused my machine
to go up a bit (I didn't do any measurements), but I also had full debug
on DBus/partly powersaved, so this doesn't say anything...
Thomas
_______________________________________________
powersave-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://forge.novell.com/mailman/listinfo/powersave-devel
