On Mon 13. Feb - 15:53:50, Danny Kukawka wrote:
> On Monday 13 February 2006 15:47, Holger Macht wrote:
> > On Mon 13. Feb - 14:58:09, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > > Me again,
> > >
> > > is this really a kpowersave problem or is it powersaved sending the
> > > wrong current state of the cpu?
> >
> > It is KPowersave reading out this information. It checks for a
> > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq directory and if not present it
> > assumes that the cpu is offline. This is wrong. It has to check the
> > content of /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/online. Because cpufreq might be
> > not supported but the cpu is online ;-)
> >
> > Danny, can you look into this?
>
> See my other mail, this is not a problem
> with /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/online, this is a problem on Celeron and
> other cpufreq not supporting machines. Daniel is working on this for the next
> release next week.
I talked to Daniel and the changes he will make solves this problem.
Nevertheless, it _is_ a problem of the read out implementation.
Regards,
Holger
>
> Danny
> _______________________________________________
> powersave-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://forge.novell.com/mailman/listinfo/powersave-devel
_______________________________________________
powersave-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://forge.novell.com/mailman/listinfo/powersave-devel
