Danny Kukawka wrote: > On Monday 13 February 2006 15:47, Holger Macht wrote: >> On Mon 13. Feb - 14:58:09, Michael Biebl wrote: >>> Me again, >>> >>> is this really a kpowersave problem or is it powersaved sending the >>> wrong current state of the cpu? >> It is KPowersave reading out this information. It checks for a >> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq directory and if not present it >> assumes that the cpu is offline. This is wrong. It has to check the >> content of /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/online. Because cpufreq might be >> not supported but the cpu is online ;-) >> >> Danny, can you look into this? > > See my other mail, this is not a problem > with /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/online, this is a problem on Celeron and > other cpufreq not supporting machines. Daniel is working on this for the next > release next week.
According to the bug reporter this bug is not fixed yet for 0.5.8. Is that correct? I can't test it myself and haven't looked at the code yet. Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ powersave-devel mailing list powersave-devel@forge.novell.com http://forge.novell.com/mailman/listinfo/powersave-devel
