On Friday 27 October 2006 03:18, Michael Biebl wrote: > Danny Kukawka wrote: > > (6) Timeframe > > ========================== > > A first stable running version - without not needed stuff from (3) - > > until openSUSE Beta1/2/final. With the new stable and without dependecy > > to powersave we can think about push KPowersave into KDE SVN as default > > KDE powermanagent applet. > > So your target is KDE 3.5.* atm?
Yes, as first step. > What about KDE4, is there any collaboration with the guys working on > Solid? I guess they could use your experience on this topic. There is currently no really collaboration. I discussed already some months ago with one of the solid developer (IIRC Kevin Ottens) about the powermanagemnt stuff in solid, but nothing more. At the moment I feel not so confident about Solid. I'm not sure what the advantage of this "yet an other level of indirection" for KPowersave could be. We have now: kernel <-> HAL <-> D-Bus <-> KPowersave (and back) and with Solid we would have: kernel <-> HAL <-> D-Bus <-> Solid <-> KPowersave (and back) I see currently no advantage. But let see what the future bring ... Cheers, Danny _______________________________________________ powersave-devel mailing list powersave-devel@forge.novell.com http://forge.novell.com/mailman/listinfo/powersave-devel