WTO ruling could curb global farm aid Elizabeth Becker/NYT The New York Times Tuesday, April 27, 2004
WASHINGTON In a landmark case, Brazil has won a preliminary ruling at the World Trade Organization that could compel Washington to cut farm subsidies and force the United States, Europe and other wealthy economies to make greater concessions to poor countries at global trade talks. . In the first successful challenge of a wealthy nation's domestic agricultural subsidies, the WTO sided on Monday with Brazil's arguments that U.S. subsidy payments to cotton farmers unfairly expanded U.S. production and exports while lowering world prices. . The $300 billion in annual farm subsidies and supports paid by the world's wealthiest nations have been the bane of Third World farmers and have blocked an agreement liberalizing global trade for more than a year. . The United Nations, the World Bank and charities like Oxfam have said their elimination or reduction would provide the single biggest improvement possible for the economies of poor countries made up of subsistence farmers. . Brazil was joined in the WTO case as third parties by Argentina, Australia, Benin, Canada, Chad, China, the European Union, India, New Zealand, Pakistan, Paraguay, Taiwan and Venezuela. . A final ruling against the United States could lead to stiff penalties if the Bush administration fails to change its practices. In another case involving imported steel, President George W. Bush chose to remove tariffs rather than face the penalties. The case could also affect the way the United States and other nations dole out subsidies for other farm commodities. . "This could mean problems for all domestic subsidy programs, for corn, wheat, rice, everything that receives big direct payments from the United States Treasury," said Ken Cook, president of the Environmental Working Group, a nonprofit organization that posted a database of subsidies on its Web site that was used by Brazil. . Gerald Estur, a statistician with the International Cotton Advisory Committee in Washington, told Bloomberg News that the case "could have implications for soybeans, corn, everything." . Brazilian officials said they had brought the case against the United States out of frustration, saying that all attempts by poorer nations to negotiate a reduction of the subsidies had failed. . The ruling was not publicly disclosed, and the United States and Brazil have agreed not to discuss the findings in detail until the final decision is made in June. But at a news conference in Brasilia, top government officials said they were pleased and gratified with the ruling. . "This is a precedent; this is a war that must continue," said Roberto Azevedo, the top legal adviser to Brazil's Foreign Ministry. . Brazil accused the United States of breaking trade rules that limit to $1.6 billion the amount of subsidies it can pay American cotton growers every year. The United States defended the additional financing as domestic subsidies that do no harm to global markets. . But using data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Brazil argued that the programs led to increased American cotton production that destroyed Brazil's export markets and undermined farmers. Without the subsidies, Brazil estimated that U.S. cotton production would have fallen 29 percent and that American cotton exports would have dropped 41 percent. That would have led to a rise in international cotton prices of 12.6 percent, which would have helped Brazil's cotton farmers. . Brazil also said that the United States was providing illegal export subsidies to American agribusinesses and manufacturers, who were given $1.7 billion to buy American cotton. A U.S. trade official said Monday night that the Bush administration would appeal the decision if the final report was unchanged. . "U.S. farm programs were designed to be and are fully consistent with our WTO obligations," said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the confidential nature of the ruling. "We have serious concerns with aspects of the panel report." . The 15-nation European Union agreed last week to start dismantling protections for hops, olive oil and cotton in 2006. Under the agreement, production-linked payments for cotton will be slashed by 60 percent. . "We don't have any restrictions to our cotton market and don't use export subsidies," Christina Rueda, head of cotton at the Committee of Agricultural Organizations in Brussels, told Bloomberg News. As a result, she said, she doesn't expect the EU's payments to be challenged by the WTO. . "The commission proposed these reforms in the light of any eventual WTO complaint," Rueda said. . American farmers have benefited handsomely from the expansion in world trade, and their exports have exploded over the past few years. One out of every three acres in the United States is now planted for exports. . The cotton subsidies have helped make the United States the world's top cotton exporter, with more than 40 percent of the world market. . Poor nations have long contended that this expansion is based unfairly on subsidies that fuel overproduction and drive down world prices. Those prices do not harm big farmers in the United States because they are subsidized. . The United States argued in its submission that its subsidies were not linked directly to the production of cotton and, therefore, did not distort trade. But the ruling Monday night threw that argument into doubt, calling into question the basis of much of the domestic agricultural subsidy system. . The existing subsidies for American cotton farmers - $10 billion over seven years - were partly responsible for the breakdown in global trade talks in Cancun, Mexico, in September. . West African countries, some of the poorest in the world, made cotton a test case of the WTO's commitment to remove barriers to poor nations' ability to trade their agricultural products. But the United States offered, instead, to study the cotton issue and consider reducing subsidies as well as removing nontariff and other trading barriers on cotton, synthetic fibers, textiles and clothing. . With the United States and Europe vowing to revive those stalled trade talks over the summer, the question of agricultural subsidies and supports, especially for cotton, will be back on the agenda. . The largest American farmers have grown dependent on the $19 billion they receive in annual subsidies. . If the final decision in June goes against the United States, the administration is expected to appeal, if for no other reason than to delay action until after the election. Nearly all preliminary opinions are eventually upheld by the WTO. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada. http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511 http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/BRUplB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> *************************************************************************** Berdikusi dg Santun & Elegan, dg Semangat Persahabatan. Menuju Indonesia yg Lebih Baik, in Commonality & Shared Destiny. www.arsip.da.ru *************************************************************************** __________________________________________________________________________ Mohon Perhatian: 1. Harap tdk. memposting/reply yg menyinggung SARA (kecuali sbg otokritik) 2. Pesan yg akan direply harap dihapus, kecuali yg akan dikomentari. 3. Lihat arsip sebelumnya, www.ppi-india.da.ru; 4. Posting: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5. Satu email perhari: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6. No-email/web only: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7. kembali menerima email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
