Tentang peristiwa Mei 98 dan atrocity in East Timor,
"Very difficult situation" menjadi dalih excuse
pelanggaran kemanusiaan????????

simak wawancara di bawah ini: 

A Talk with Bambang Yudhoyono (int'l edition)

(BUSINESSWEEK ONLINE : SEPTEMBER 11, 2000 ISSUE)


Indonesia's New Defense Minister discusses his plan
for restoring stability -- and why he feels the army
was innocent of human-rights violations 

Bambang Yudhoyono rose to the rank of
lieutenant-general in the Indonesian army and became
its political commissar in the final days of the
Suharto regime. He was put in charge of the official
process of removing the army from politics and was
next in line for the post of army chief. On Aug. 23,
he was named Coordinating Minister for Defense &
Security. The post had been left vacant for six months
by General Wiranto, who was sacked in February amid an
inquiry into his role in warcrimes in East Timor.
Yudhoyono is now a key player in the Indonesian
government's attempts to restore law and order, and
make Indonesia more attractive target for foreign
investment. 

Singapore Bureau Chief Michael Shari interviewed
Yudhoyono at his official residence in Jakarta on Aug.
30. Edited excerpts of their conversation follow.

Q: Is the role of the military in Indonesian politics
growing or decreasing?
A: Since 1998, the Indonesian military has decided to
stay out of day-to-day politics. The basic idea of
military reform is to go back to the role and function
of the military as a defense force and move them away
from politics systematically. The reform is going in
the right direction. That means that the main
activities of the military are now again to
restructure its doctrine, its paradigm, and its rules
in society. It means that the trend is moving in such
a way that there is no so-called dual function of the
military, there is no so-called social political
mission in the military.

With people like myself and some colleagues who are
now working in the government, in the Cabinet, [it
becomes clear] we're no longer part of the active
officers who are working with the organization. But we
are now true politicians, holding political posts and
accomplishing political "missions."

Q: What's the purpose of having recently retired
senior generals in the Cabinet?
A: There is no connection between us and the
[military] organization. In the past, generals who
held political posts still had relations with the
organization. The framework was [such] that they were
fulfilling the so-called dual-function mission. And
now, it's completely changed. There is no more
organization between us and the former organization.

Q: Then why did Wahid want to appoint you, Agum
Gumelar, Luhut Panjaitan, and Suryadi Sudirdja -- all
retired generals -- to the Cabinet?
A: Well, I think that's the prerogative of the
President to select whoever [he wants] without
specifying the genesis or background of the man. In my
mind, the President has the right to select, to
appoint, any single citizen to hold a political post.
It's quite simple, I think.

Q: You're still seen as having influence in the
military and therefore qualified to stabilize the
political situation, and therefore stabilize the
economy. Is this not true?
A: In this context, I'm not a retired general but the
Coordinating Minister for Political, Social & Security
Affairs. I do understand that we have to support the
effort for the recovery of our economy by establishing
a conducive climate -- legal certainty, security, law
and order -- in order for our economic-recovery
programs to move well. And this is my priority in this
new setup.

So I will concentrate my effort, together with the
commanders of the TNI [acronym for Indonesian armed
forces], with the chief of the police department, and
with all governmental agencies to be part of restoring
security, law and order, of building a good climate
for business, so that Rizal Ramli's program can work
well. I don't know whether President Gus Dur [a
nickname for Abdurrahman Wahid] considers the fact
that I have a military background. Probably, it's
thought that I know how we should maintain stability
and how we should maintain security, law and order,
even in the difficult time of the post-crisis
situation in Indonesia.

Q: So how should you maintain law and order?
A: There are two critical problems we face now,
problems of national disintegration. We have to be
able to find a just, realistic, and constitutional
solution for Aceh, Maluku, and Irian Jaya. That's No.
1. If we are able to build an integrated national
policy on that -- containing the economic, political,
and social message, as well as law and security -- I
think that we will be able to move in the right
direction with a great degree of consistency. 

Secondly, dealing with social disharmony, law
disobedience within our society, I think we have to
encourage our police corps, supported indirectly by an
on-call military organization, to stop the riots, stop
the civil disturbances that happen in some parts of
Indonesia. And there must be a national campaign to
stop the lawlessness in this country. I encourage the
Ministry of Home Affairs, the police corps, and all
regional apparatus to be part of maintaining or
restoring law and order.

Q: How can you encourage them?
A: Well, this new Cabinet is off to a good start. At
the first meeting at our office yesterday, we agreed
to put this program into a top priority. We know that
the society is now demanding a sense of safety and
security. They need social order. So I think we have
to respond promptly. And basically, once again, we
will ask everybody, all government agencies, to do
whatever they can do this year to bring back the
regional security, law and order.

Q: Can you work with the current army brass at the
moment?
A: Yes. Indirectly, the military organizations and the
police corps are under my scope of social, political,
and security affairs. They all report to the
President. But on a daily basis, I coordinate all
those tasks. I synchronize the policies. I synchronize
the operational activities of all those entities. I
deal with [armed forces Commander-in-Chief] Admiral
Widodo only because, in our system, army, navy, and
air-force chiefs are not dealing with upper echelon
activities, but deal with the internal management of
the service. I deal directly with Admiral Widodo,
General Rusdihardjo, the Ministers of Defense and Home
Affairs, and the Attorney General.

Q: In your opinion, why has the military not been able
to stop outbreaks of violence in Aceh, Maluku, and
West Papua?
A: Because of many things. In Maluku, the degree of
hostility among the conflicting factions is so high.
And there are many traitors. And there must be also
external influence. So the problem is not only to stop
the fighting but also to ask everybody to reconcile.
That is No. 1. So we need a different approach...to
bring all regional figures to sit down and talk and
try to reconcile their problems. 

The roots of the Aceh movement are so deep, and it's
not easy to convince [Aceh] that special autonomy is
the answer, as well as in Irian Jaya. But in my mind,
we have to formulate and implement an integrated
national policy. Secondly, we have to do whatever we
can in economic, social, and political affairs, and
impose legal actions and security actions if
necessary. And I think our military and police need a
legal framework and political decisions to act
promptly, because I feel that our soldiers are afraid
of being accused of violating human rights. So there
must be clear-cut political direction from the
political leadership. And there must be a legal
umbrella so that the military and police can act
promptly....

Q: Is that why the so-called nonretroactivity clause
was written into an amendment to the constitution on
Aug. 16, to grant soldiers amnesty from human-rights
abuses?
A: I would like to study that specific point before
commenting. But I do hope that we go back to logic and
the principles of law. Sometimes, law must be matched
with real justice. There will be a distance between
the text of the law and the logic and the real justice
in society.

But let me comment on other aspects. The Indonesian
military and police were part of the former government
policy.... When the political format changed
because...of Indonesian reforms, I think we should not
look at what has been done by the military in the past
in black-and-white situations. We have to put
everything in the proper context. So we have to
evaluate and judge what has been done by the military
in the past. Those kinds of factors are to be
considered. It does not mean that we will not have
freedom of movement to form a new law, new
regulations, or [a new] code of conduct [for] the
military.... 

Q: Can you explain why ethnic Chinese investors from
Hong Kong, Singapore, and Taiwan are concerned that
the Indonesian military would not protect them?
A: There must be a trauma. What happened in May, 1998,
was a riot in Jakarta. But I could assure everybody,
including the Chinese residents of this country, that
the government, the police, and the military will
protect everybody. No discrimination. We do not have a
discriminatory policy in this matter. One of our
commitments is to bring the feeling of safety and
security for everybody. And the time has come, I
think, that we have to prove to the world, as well as
our people, that we will impose the same protection
for everybody. We will pay attention to that because
we are really disturbed by what happened in May, 1998.

Q: Was the military involved in what happened in
Jakarta in May, 1998?
A: Well, I was in the military at that time. I think
it's hard to believe that the military organized or
got involved in that incident, I must say. Because we
were obliged to maintain security. Everybody knows
that the situation was very tense.... I still remember
we were facing a very difficult situation. On the one
hand, there was a proper President and government. On
the other hand, there was a student movement that
wanted a dramatic change in Indonesian politics and
the Indonesian government. And the military tried to
do its best to maintain security. So once again, I do
believe very strongly there was no intent in the
military to initiate or be part of that riot.

Q: What happened in East Timor last September simply
confirmed to a lot of people that the military failed
to protect people in May, 1998, in Jakarta. And in
both cases, witnesses claim they saw Indonesian
soldiers in uniform who were directly involved. So
people started to see a pattern.
A: I will not actually enter that issue. Because our
legal institutions are now working on that. But as a
former military man, I could tell you that the
situation was very difficult at that time. The crisis
occurred between the pro-integration militia and the
Falantil or armed element of [East Timor leader]
Xanana Gusmau. When the situation is bad, it's
difficult for the Indonesian military and police to
stop the fighting, to control the situation. And
probably one or two units, a group of people, were
trapped and forced to take sides in that fighting. But
as far as I know, there [was] no order from a higher
authority for the Indonesian soldiers to conduct
unnecessary actions. 

You can imagine that the situation was very difficult
then. It's not easy for small unit leaders or soldiers
to stay out of the fighting.... That might create the
international opinion that the Indonesian military is
part of the disturbances and controlled or commanded
that kind of action. Again, I'd better let the let the
legal process investigate and deal with this kind of
incident.

Q: How are you working together with Megawati
Sukarnoputri and Rizal Ramli, and why were the three
of you selected to do this?
A: Everybody knows that our congress, the MPR, has
decided to support the idea of President Gus Dur to
assign the Vice-President the day-to-day business of
the government. And everybody hopes that Megawati can
perform her task well. And in our new structure, both
Rizal Ramli and myself are supposed to play the role
of coordinating ministers and also assist the
Vice-President in fulfilling her duties. That's why we
have to set up a new mechanism -- how should we
develop policy, how should we prepare things to be
decided by the President, by the Vice-President
herself?

In this context, we do hear criticism from society
that the big weakness of the past Cabinet was lack of
coordination, lack of synchronization and integration
in policy and decisions. So because of that weakness,
we have decided to introduce new mechanisms, a new
setup, and a process of making decisions, and
developing policy. That's why both of us have to
assist Megawati. In turn, Megawati will assist
President Gus Dur. And that's the whole task of the
government.

Q: Do you think that Megawati will someday be
President of Indonesia?
A: If you're asking me, I think everything is
possible. It depends on the people, it depends on
Megawati herself, and it depends on many factors now
and in the future. I think President Gus Dur has given
a chance to Megawati to do more in the government.
With this authority, Megawati has to prove to people
that she can perform well. Actually, she has a chance
to be a President in the future. The people are
waiting for her performance, especially in this new
setup.

Q: So you and Rizal are helping Megawati to help Gus
Dur. This seems rather complicated. Why can't Gus Dur
and Megawati just work together and run the country?
A: [laughter] Let me explain it this way: Actually, we
are in one team -- the President, Vice-President, two
coordinating ministers, and all [the other] ministers.
In practice, of course, we have to be close in setting
the agenda, developing options, and making
decisions.... This means the tasks given by Gus Dur
can be fulfilled well. This is my paradigm, my
understanding. And of course there is communication
between the two. But since Megawati is given the
day-to-day task of running the government, of course I
have to stay close to her. Of course, I also [have to]
stay close to Gus Dur.

Q: Does Megawati's day-to-day authority just mean that
she does what Gus Dur tells her to do, or does she
have the authority to decide what to do?
A: There is a presidential decree which states clearly
the authority given to Megawati. And I think she will
stay at that [level of] authority. Megawati is given
authority to make operational decisions. That is to be
elaborated in the new regulation.... What has been
agreed in our option program, for example, is
considered an operational matter. That kind of
decision, I think, can be decided by Megawati. But I
have to wait for the concrete explanation of that.

Q: So you're not sure how much authority she has.
A: I think she has significant authority. Some people
think the authority given to Megawati is too much. Of
course, there's another opinion that it's too
little.... The framework is that Megawati is part of
the government and part of developing solutions. It
should not to be seen as, "How much power does she get
vis-�-vis Gus Dur's power?" It's very dangerous if we
look at power sharing in terms of political power. But
again, the basic aim is to make this government more
efficient, more effective, and having a higher degree
of performance.

Q: What's the message that you want to get across?
A: We have to stay united. We have to improve our
coordination. I hope that our colleagues are fully
committed to being part of the solution, have loyalty
to the leadership of the government -- both President
Gus Dur and Megawati -- and respond to the people's
need to bring back security, prosperity, and
stability.

http://www.ask.co.uk/ix.asp?q=Bambang+Yudhoyono&ac=none&xx=0&qid=7D9972E155047A4397B930A796196966&p=0&&sp=ix&fn=t&b=0&fo=2&r=10&io=3&fp=4&fr=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eadinfo%2Ebusinessweek%2Ecom%2F2000%2F00%5F37%2Fb3698216%2Ehtm&adurl=


                
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail 


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Yahoo! Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Z1wmxD/DREIAA/yQLSAA/BRUplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

***************************************************************************
Berdikusi dg Santun & Elegan, dg Semangat Persahabatan. Menuju Indonesia yg Lebih 
Baik, in Commonality & Shared Destiny. www.ppi.4t.com
***************************************************************************
__________________________________________________________________________
Mohon Perhatian:

1. Harap tdk. memposting/reply yg menyinggung SARA (kecuali sbg otokritik)
2. Pesan yg akan direply harap dihapus, kecuali yg akan dikomentari.
3. Lihat arsip sebelumnya, www.ppi-india.da.ru; 
4. Posting: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5. Satu email perhari: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6. No-email/web only: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7. kembali menerima email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Kirim email ke