The New York Time
September 8, 2004
Spurred by Illness, Indonesians Lash Out at U.S.
Mining Giant
By JANE PERLEZ and EVELYN RUSLI

BUYAT BAY BEACH, Indonesia - First the fish began to
disappear. Then villagers began developing strange
rashes and bumps. Finally in January, Masna Stirman,
"The nurse said: 'Ma'am, the baby has deformities,' "
Mrs. Stirman, 39, recalled in an interview. Unable to
get any meaningful medical help in this remote fishing
village of about 300 people, she watched as her fourth
child suffered for months and then died in July. 

The infant's death came after years of complaints by
local fishermen about waste dumped in the ocean by the
owner of a nearby gold mine, the Newmont Mining
Corporation, the world's biggest gold producer, based
in Denver. It also kicked up a political brawl pitting
Indonesia's feisty environmental groups against the
American mining giant, which has been trailed by
allegations of pollution on four continents. 
The fight has aroused intense interest in mining
circles and among environmental groups for the fresh
concerns it raises about how rich multinational
companies - especially those that extract resources
like coal, copper and gold as well as oil and natural
gas - conduct themselves in poor nations.

For Newmont, the battle is only the latest round of
troubles as the company, concerned by the more
stringent rules for mining permits in the United
States, seeks greater growth from operations overseas,
where environmental groups and, increasingly,
government officials charge that it employs practices
not tolerated at home. 

No definitive cause has been found for the illnesses
among the villagers. Company executives, Newmont said
in a statement, were "convinced that we are not
polluting the waters of Buyat Bay or adversely
affecting the health of the people in that area." 
But on Aug. 31, an Indonesian government panel
announced that Newmont "had illegally disposed" of
waste containing arsenic and mercury in the ocean near
the mine site, and had failed to get the required
permits from the Ministry of Environment since 1996.
The environment minister, Nabiel Makarim, said the
company might face criminal charges. 

The findings came a week after a local legal aid group
filed a suit on behalf of three villagers, including
the baby's mother, in a district court in South
Jakarta, alleging that they and the baby had been made
sick by the mine waste. They are seeking $543 million
in damages. 

The company denied the charges and said in its
statement that it "operates in full compliance with
Indonesian and U.S. environmental standards."
Newmont has run into trouble before, even at home. But
some of the gravest allegations of polluting mining
practices have come from its operations in developing
nations, from Indonesia to Peru to Turkey. 

Here, the fight with Newmont has fueled a growing
popular impression that mining and energy companies
hold a tight grip over Indonesia's weak regulatory
system. Many blame the corruption, cronyism and
unevolved legal structure inherited from General
Suharto, the dictator whose rule ended in 1998 and
who, for a price, eagerly opened the doors to foreign
investors. 

When Newmont first came looking for gold in Indonesia
in the 1980's, it dealt with the Suharto government.
Since then, a handful of officials knowledgeable about
the environment have said they wanted to stand up to
Newmont and other companies, but lost the battles. 
In Newmont's case, correspondence shows that from 2000
to 2002 the Ministry of Environment challenged Newmont
about the toxicity of the mine waste it was dumping at
Buyat Bay. In a letter to Newmont in March 2002, a
senior ministry official, Isa Karnisa Ardiputra,
listed seven points of concern and asked for
"immediate action." 

In an interview at Newmont's Jakarta headquarters on
Aug. 27, the president of Newmont in Indonesia,
Richard B. Ness, and other company officials said they
were not aware of the letter. 

Emil Salim, a minister of the environment during the
Suharto era, who is overseeing the panel that found
Newmont had acted illegally, reflected the anger of
many Indonesians over the dumping of waste that was
allowed to go on for years despite such challenges
from parts of the government. 

"We are weak in governance in mining," he said. Using
the mine industry's word to describe the waste, Mr.
Salim said he had told the company: "I am not against
you. But please don't put your tailings in our ocean."

Some sense a potential turning point in the outrage
stirred by the death of Mrs. Stirman's baby.

The mother was told by a doctor, Sandra Rotty, an
Indonesian who works at the Newmont financed health
center at nearby Ratatok, that the child had a common
skin disease. After examining the baby in April, Dr.
Rotty wrote to a local environmental group, Kelola,
that the baby's skin "disorder" was "caused by
malnutrition."
"Now, the baby's condition is already better," she
added. 

When the child showed no improvement, however, the
group asked a team of public health doctors to visit
Buyat Bay.
About 120 villagers were waiting to be examined in
June in the ad hoc clinic set up in three local homes.
Thirty of the villagers had tumor-like growths, said
one of the doctors, Jane Pangemanan. 
"I was shocked by what I saw," she said in an
interview. Of the 60 people she examined, about 80
percent showed symptoms of poisoning by mercury and
arsenic, she said. 

On a recent visit to the community, and judging from
the villagers who came to the Jakarta courthouse for
the opening of the case on Aug. 27, the health
problems were evident at almost every turn. 
One of the babies had a cyst the size of a small pea
on the end of her tongue. A mother had two lumps on
her breasts the size of golf balls. One woman had a
large lump down her left side that made her look half
pregnant. 

A lawyer for Newmont, Palmer Situmorang, said the
lumps and skin diseases that the villagers complained
about were the result of "poor sanitation and poor
nutrition." 

"They are liars because their orientation is to just
get money," he said.
But an environmental scientist, Evan Edinger, who is
an assistant professor at the University of
Newfoundland in Canada and who is working with the
Indonesian environmental group Friends of the Earth,
said he believed that arsenic in the mine waste was
the main cause of the illnesses.

In laboratory tests in Canada, he found that about 30
percent of the arsenic in the sediment from Buyat Bay
was soluble in weak acid environments, like the
digestive tracts of worms, he said in an interview. 
"Our hypothesis is that if you have sediment-feeding
organisms and bottom-dwelling fish eat them, then that
could be the pathway to contamination from arsenic,"
Mr. Edinger said. 

Newmont's own laboratory results also show high levels
of arsenic in the sediment. But the company contends
that the arsenic remains inert and nonsoluble in the
ocean. 

In a paper released to the news media, Newmont said
that "collectively, there is no scientific evidence to
suggest that mining activity at Minahasa has resulted
in arsenic contamination of Buyat Bay biological
ecosystem."

The national police chief in Indonesia, Gen. Da'i
Bachtiar, released the police's own laboratory results
in August that showed mercury contamination of the
sea. The company disputed the results, saying the
police did not measure dissolved mercury. 
But General Da'i's chief investigator in the case,
Sulistiandriatmoko, retorted: "We are not that stupid.
We measured the dissolved mercury, not the total
mercury. I think they are just trying to distort the
case."

The Newmont mine above Buyat Bay is on the northern
tip of Sulawesi in Minahasa, a region where fishermen
in handmade wooden boats have been trawling for
hundreds of years. Where small vanilla, clove and
coconut plantations once prospered, Newmont carved
five pits into the brown earth. 

With its relatively low costs and high-grade gold that
was easy to get at, it was a "little model of a mine,"
said Ali Sahami, a geologist who works as one of
Newmont's environmental advisers. At the height of
production from 1998 to 2000, the mine was producing
nearly 25 percent of the company's international
output. 

Newmont finished mining in 2001 and has since been
processing mined ore, work it was scheduled to
complete on Aug. 31.

Villagers say the fish off their beach were once so
plentiful they would start a fire for grilling before
setting off to catch the evening meal. But almost
immediately after mining operations started, the fish
stocks dropped dramatically. 

Rasit Rahman, a squat man with a thick tangle of black
hair, who had a lump removed from the back of his neck
recently, was one of the plaintiffs who appeared in
court on Aug. 27. 

"My catch dwindled so fast after the mine came, I
could no longer afford to send my youngest son to
school," he said. Before the mine company came to the
area in 1996, he said, he could earn $30 a day, a
substantial amount in a village without electricity
and running water. "We had to look for another place
to catch fish," he said. "It was so much harder, and
we were getting so little."

At issue is Newmont's use of a waste disposal method,
effectively banned in the United States under the
Clean Water Act, that is called submarine tailing
disposal. It involves piping treated mine waste into
the ocean. 
Newmont uses the method not only at the mine near
Buyat Bay, but also at its far bigger copper and gold
mine on the island of Sumbawa. 
The legal aid group, Agency for Health Law, which has
brought the suit on behalf of the villagers, charges
that the system polluted the warm equatorial waters
around the village, where people depend almost
exclusively on fish for food as well as for their
livelihoods. 
In the interview at the company's headquarters, Mr.
Ness, the Newmont president in Indonesia, defended the
use of the waste system. He also made that case before
an Indonesian parliamentary committee in August. 
He said it was more "responsible" to put the waste in
the sea than store it on land that could be subject to
earthquakes. Furthermore, he said, "Tailings are
nothing more than ground-up rock." 
Others disagree. Environmental groups vociferously
oppose the sea disposal of waste. Some mining
companies, like the Australian giant BHP Billiton, say
they would not use such a method in current projects,
even though it is cheaper than land-based waste
storage.
Robert E. Moran, a hydrogeologist who advises mining
companies and environmental groups, said in a
telephone interview from Colorado that "clearly
tailings are much more complex chemically than crushed
rock - or else they would not require detoxification
treatment prior to disposal." 
The waste from the mine being released into the sea
amounted to a potentially "toxic soup," he said. 
Mr. Moran, who reviewed partial analyses from the
plant made available by Newmont, said he was confident
that the waste consisted of metal-like elements like
arsenic and antimony and metals like mercury, cadmium,
lead, copper and zinc. 
Those substances in the rock where the gold is found,
he said, are treated with sodium cyanide, and the
subsequent mixture is treated again with other
chemicals in an attempt to reduce the concentration of
cyanides. 
In all likelihood, Mr. Moran said, some amount of
cyanide compounds and other organic chemicals remained
in the waste that was released into the ocean less
than a half mile off shore at a relatively shallow
depth of about 82 meters. 
In tropical waters like those around Buyat Bay, the
toxic compounds often became "more mobile and more
accessible to the food chain than in temperate
waters," Mr. Moran said. 
Washington's political risk insurance agency, the
Overseas Private Investment Corporation, does not like
the submarine tailing disposal system, either. In the
late 1990's, the agency refused to give insurance to a
mine operated by Rio Tinto in Papua New Guinea on the
grounds that the mine's submarine tailing system would
violate United States domestic regulations. 
Newmont will essentially leave the site near Buyat Bay
early next year, although a small skeleton staff will
be on hand for three years to complete reclamation and
oversee some community development projects, Newmont
officials said. 
To its critics, Newmont says its mine closure plan
will leave a community better off than when the
company arrived. The plan shows photographs of a new
school and groups of happy children splashing in clean
water. 
But the villagers at the beach say they are
uninterested. They are no longer able to sell their
fish in the local markets. In addition to the
illnesses that many now suffer, their livelihoods are
shattered, said Anwar Stirman, the brother of Mrs.
Stirman. 
"We can no longer make money from the fish," Mr.
Stirman said. "We're talking to the provincial
officials about our future. The whole village is
waiting to be moved to another location."
In any event, Newmont contends that the sea at Buyat
Bay is in fine shape. The company ran color
advertisements saying so in 10 Indonesian newspapers
at the end of August. 
"We find the water is in excellent condition," said
Robert Humberson, general manager for external
relations. "I dive there myself. It's fabulous."



http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/business/article/0,1299,DRMN_4_3166781
,00.html


Newmont fights waste charges
Gold mining firm dumps in ocean, Indonesia alleges


By Gargi Chakrabarty, Rocky Mountain News
September 8, 2004

Denver's high-profile gold company, Newmont Mining
Corp., is fighting allegations on four continents that
it is polluting with mining waste.

In the latest case, the company is facing charges in
Indonesia that it dumped waste in the ocean near a
coastal mining site, polluting the waters. Indonesian
police are questioning two Newmont executives.

Newmont, the world's biggest gold producer, also is
fighting environment-related charges at its mining
sites in Nevada, and in Peru, Ghana and Turkey.

The company argues that it is a target because of its
size and that most charges are political and have
little to do with environmental issues.

"When you are the biggest in an industry, critic
groups put their -focus on the big dog, and that's how
it is," said Newmont spokesman Doug Hock.

Since last Thursday, more than 1,000 activists have
been blocking the roads and highways to Yanacocha -
the world's largest gold mine - in Peru. They are
protesting Newmont's plan to expand the mine to Cerro
Quilish, which they say could contaminate the drinking
water supply to the town of Cajamarca.

The company is "not stepping up to the plate in terms
of environmental and social responsibility," said
Payal Sampat, international campaign director
of Earthworks, an activist group based in Washington.
"I don't think it is a coincidence that so many
stories are cropping up in different parts of the
world.

"In terms of its size, standing and finances, Newmont
could be a leader in the mining industry by being
receptive to community issues.

"But from the cases in Indonesia, Peru and other
regions, it is evident that the company is lagging
behind in playing that role," Sampat said.

In Ghana, for instance, Newmont is planning to open a
gold mine in Akyem, which is home to rare plant and
animal species, Sampat said.

But Newmont's Hock pointed to discrepancies in tests
at the Indonesia operation.

Water samples taken by the Indonesian police from the
Buyat Bay where Newmont disposed waste from the
Minahasa Raya mine showed a mercury level of 4.668
micrograms per liter.

In contrast, simultaneous samples taken by a
laboratory in Indonesia hired by Newmont showed 0.055
micrograms per liter. Samples by Australia's
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research
organization - also hired by Newmont - averaged only
0.005 micrograms per liter.

"The police tests showed . . . higher levels of
mercury than the other tests," Hock said. "This
discrepancy in the test results certainly raises many
questions."

Referring to the roadblocks near Cajamarca in Peru,
Hock said Newmont is in favor of a dialogue with
concerned parties to resolve the outstanding issues.

"We followed all the rules that were outlined for us
and have been a good corporate citizen. But now our
rights are being jeopardized," Hock said.

Newmont's troubles around the world


MINAHASA RAYA


. Location: North Sulawesi, Indonesia


. At issue: Newmont disposed of its tailings or waste
in the waters of Buyat
Bay, a method permitted by the government. An
investigation alleges heavy
metal pollution.


. Newmont's position: The Indonesian government has
asked the World Health
Organization to look into the allegations.


YANACOCHA


. Location: Cajamarca, Peru


. At issue: Newmont's plans to expand its mine at
Cerro Quilish. Activists
say that will contaminate the drinking water.


. Newmont's position: Hydrological tests performed to
date indicate the
impact is minimal.


OVACIK


. Location: Bergama district, Turkey


. At issue: The mine, which was closed, was operating
under a government
decree that the Turkish high court deemed illegal.


. Newmont's position: The Turkish Ministry of
Environment and Forest
approved the permits.


GOLD QUARRY


. Location: near Carlin, Nev.


. Status: Opened in 1984.


. At issue: A Nevada district judge recently ruled
that the state illegally
allowed Newmont to relax the water-quality standards.


. Newmont's position: The company is reviewing the
court's decision.


ROSIA MONTANA


. Location: Rosia Montana, Romania


. At issue: Newmont is buying a 10 percent stake in
Gabriel Resources.
Activists say people would be displaced by this
project.


. Newmont's position: The company conducted due
diligence before making its
investment.


[EMAIL PROTECTED] or 303-892-2976


Copyright 2004, Rocky Mountain News. All Rights
Reserved.


 
===EARTHWORKS
   Protecting communities and the environment
   from the destructive impacts of mineral
development===


Alan Septoff
Research/IT Director


1612 K St., NW, Suite 808
Washington, D.C., USA  20006
p: 202-887-1872x205 
f: 202-887-1875
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w: earthworksaction.org 
    
NOTE: Mineral Policy Center became EARTHWORKS on March
1st, 2004. 



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
$9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/BRUplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

***************************************************************************
Berdikusi dg Santun & Elegan, dg Semangat Persahabatan. Menuju Indonesia yg Lebih 
Baik, in Commonality & Shared Destiny. www.ppi.4t.com
***************************************************************************
__________________________________________________________________________
Mohon Perhatian:

1. Harap tdk. memposting/reply yg menyinggung SARA (kecuali sbg otokritik)
2. Pesan yg akan direply harap dihapus, kecuali yg akan dikomentari.
3. Lihat arsip sebelumnya, www.ppi-india.da.ru; 
4. Posting: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5. Satu email perhari: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6. No-email/web only: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7. kembali menerima email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Kirim email ke