http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/FK19Ag02.html

How Russia keeps China armed
By David Isenberg

WASHINGTON - China may have lost the latest skirmish with the European Union 
to get the latter to lift its arms ban, but Beijing is still able to buy 
what it needs - solid, serviceable hardware and technology - from Russia, 
former Soviet-bloc nations and Israel.  And the embargo gives China greater 
incentive to develop its own weapons systems.

On Wednesday, the European parliament in Brussels voted, as expected, to 
maintain the EU embargo on arms trade with the People's Republic of China 
until the PRC improves its human rights record. It voted not to weaken 
national restrictions on such arms sales and said the ban should continue in 
force until the EU itself had adopted an improved code of conduct, providing 
legal restraints on arms experts. The current ban is largely voluntary, and 
strongly opposed by France and Germany.

No matter, China is still a big arms buyer, though economic constraints if 
maintained at the current level probably will keep Beijing from doing 
anything extraordinary, military-wise, for the next decade, experts say.

There is a famous incident recounted by the late Colonel Harry Summers, 
author of the classic 1982 book On Strategy: A Critical Analysis of the 
Vietnam War. In it he notes that at the very end of the war he was in Hanoi 
trying to make an agreement on the former Republic of Vietnam. In the course 
of the conversation he said, "Well, at least we never lost a battle to you." 
One North Vietnamese general then replied, "That's true, but it doesn't 
matter."

Much the same thing might be said concerning the debate over lifting the 
arms embargo on China. While China does not have the most modern weaponry or 
military technologies, the reality is that it has most of what it needs and 
is not having great difficulties in procuring from other countries, outside 
the European Union and the United States, what it does need. So the European 
parliament vote is not that significant to China.

Where does China turn when it shops for military weapons? In a word, Russia. 
According to the Russian Center for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies 
(CAST), China constitutes the largest single importer of post-Soviet Russian 
arms and military equipment, with purchases ranging between 30% and 50% of 
Russia's entire annual deliveries.

Without those arms exports to China, Russia would lack the funds to 
modernize its own military. In fact, in the past Russia has prohibited the 
export of certain of its military aircraft, or production licenses, to China 
only to revoke the ban later on.

Rosoboronexport, the sole state intermediary agency for Russia's military 
arms sales and exports, estimated that sales will total US$4.1 billion this 
year, down from $5.1 billion in 2003. Aircraft and ships account for over 
half of the exports.

China purchased eight missile systems this summer from Russia and has 
already received 24 Su-30MKK fighters. Jane's Defence Weekly reported last 
month that China is in talks with Ukraine to obtain 42 turbofan engines to 
power its NAMC JL-8 basic jet trainer/light attack jet. The talks are a 
follow up on the 58 engines ordered in 1997 and since delivered to Beijing.

China is also reported to have launched preliminary talks with Ukraine on 
the potential acquisition of the Antonov An-124 and An-225 Mriya 
heavy-transport aircraft to address long-standing strategic lift 
requirements for the People's Liberation Army. The former is the world's 
largest production aircraft and can carry a payload of at least 120 tons. 
The latter is even bigger, with a payload capacity in excess of 250 tons.

In October, the Admiralteiskiye Verfi shipyard in St Petersburg turned over 
the first of two improved Kilo-class attack submarines to China's navy, PLAN 
(People's Liberation Army Navy). The two submarines were unveiled at the 
shipyard last summer and are part of a Russia-China deal worth $1.5 billion 
that was signed in May 2002. The contract called for five submarines. Two 
are being built by Admiralteiskiye Verfi, while two others are being built 
by Sevmash in Severodvinsk. The final one is being built by Krasnoye Sormovo 
in Nizhni Novgorod.

The Kilo is considered one of the most advanced diesel-electric submarines 
in the world and the subs will boost China's ability to conduct a naval 
blockade of Taiwan. According to a November 17 article in the Asian Wall 
Street Journal, by 2007 the PLAN force  will have 12 Kilo-class subs. Most 
will be armed with "Club" anti-ship missiles, which have a range of 136 
miles.

According to John Pike, director of GlobalSecurity.org, a non-profit 
research group in Alexandria, Virginia, "China has acquired an enormous 
number of Sukhoi [fighter aircraft] variants from Russia, as well as 
destroyers and subs." He thinks the debate over an embargo is unimportant. 
"The EU decision to keep the arms embargo on China is not relevant to China 
insofar as Taiwan, or asserting rights in the South China Sea, is 
concerned," he told Asia Times Online.

Sometimes when China is blocked from obtaining military systems it desires, 
that denial serves as an incentive to develop the arms and technology 
domestically. For example, in 2000, the US pressured Israel to back out of a 
$1 billion agreement to sell China four of its Phalcon phased-array radar 
systems, which would have been used for a Chinese AWACS (Airborne Warning 
and Control System). Last week the Washington Post reported that China has 
developed its own AWACS, using a domestically produced advanced radar 
mounted on a Russian-made Il-76 transport aircraft, and is test-flying the 
first models for early deployment in the Taiwan Strait. The AWACS could be 
operational within one or two years, assuming the tests are successful.

Israel has also been a long-standing supplier of advanced military 
technologies to China. According to the findings of a past US congressional 
committee chaired by Representative Christopher Cox (Republican-California), 
Israel has "offered significant technology cooperation to the People's 
Republic of China, especially in aircraft and missile development", 
including helping China build its current F-10 fighter jet. The Chinese F-10 
is virtually identical to the discontinued Israeli Lavi fighter, an aircraft 
designed using $1.5 billion in US aid. The Lavi program, funded by the US 
and based largely on the F-16, was intended to provide Israel with its first 
domestically built fighter jet.

Israel also transferred to China its STAR-1 cruise missile technology that 
incorporates US stealth technology and is a version of Israel's Delilah-2 
missile, which contains US parts and technology.

Perhaps the biggest constraint on advanced Chinese military modernization is 
economic, not political. According to Ted Carpenter, director of foreign 
policy studies at the Washington, DC-based Cato Institute, qualitatively, 
"they are still close to a generation behind the United States. Chinese 
progress will depend on how much economic resources they want to devote to 
it," he told Asia Times Online. "At the current level they would be hard put 
to do anything in the next decade."

David Isenberg, a senior analyst with the Washington-based British American 
Security Information Council (BASIC), has a wide background in arms control 
and national security issues. The views expressed are his own.

(Copyright 2004 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 for information on our sales and syndication policies.) 



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
$9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/BRUplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

***************************************************************************
Berdikusi dg Santun & Elegan, dg Semangat Persahabatan. Menuju Indonesia yg 
Lebih Baik, in Commonality & Shared Destiny. www.ppi-india.uni.cc
***************************************************************************
__________________________________________________________________________
Mohon Perhatian:

1. Harap tdk. memposting/reply yg menyinggung SARA (kecuali sbg otokritik)
2. Pesan yg akan direply harap dihapus, kecuali yg akan dikomentari.
3. Lihat arsip sebelumnya, www.ppi-india.da.ru; 
4. Posting: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5. Satu email perhari: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6. No-email/web only: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7. kembali menerima email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Kirim email ke