Muslim doubts on extremism: Support for Terror Wanes Among Muslim Publics

By Brian Knowlton International Herald Tribune

http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/07/14/news/pew.php 

FRIDAY, JULY 15, 2005

WASHINGTON People in several predominantly Muslim countries in the Middle East 
and Asia see less justification now for violence against civilians than they 
did a year or two ago, and they increasingly share Western concerns about 
Islamic extremism, a new international poll has found. 

But the peculiar entanglement of religion and politics in these countries, and 
in Western countries with sizable Muslim minorities, produced a conflicting 
picture, also reflecting overwhelming Muslim dislike for Jews and powerful 
opposition to the U.S. presence in Iraq, the polling in 17 countries shows.

The survey - conducted by the Pew Global Attitudes Project before the July 7 
bombings in London, which are now attributed to Britons of Pakistani origin - 
found that the British public was among the least hostile to Muslims, along 
with Canadians and Americans. That tolerance is not unequivocal: At least four 
mosques in Britain have been set ablaze since the July 7 attacks. 

Nearly four years after the Sept. 11 attacks, and with terrorist attacks 
continuing around the world, a growing number of Muslims say that violence 
against civilian targets is never justified, Pew found.

That figure is highest in Morocco, followed by Indonesia and Turkey, with big 
majorities rejecting suicide bombing as an acceptable means of defending Islam.

Yet, roughly half of the Muslims questioned in Jordan, Lebanon, and Morocco 
said that in Iraq, suicide bombings against Americans and other Westerners 
could be justified. 

A belief that democratic governance would work for the Muslim world has risen 
sharply. But at the same time, in many Muslim countries, support is strong for 
a greater Islamic role in national governments. 

The poll was conducted for Pew among 17,000 people from late April to early 
June. It offers an unusually broad look at Muslim attitudes, and at Western 
attitudes on a range of Muslim issues.

The survey found a sharp drop in the numbers of Muslims saying they would 
support violence against civilians in defense of Islam.

This was most striking in countries that themselves have been hit by 
high-profile bombings. Support for such violence thus dropped sharply in 
Lebanon, where Rafik Hariri, a former prime minister, was killed in February, 
and in Morocco, where suicide bombers killed dozens of people in Casablanca in 
2003. (In every instance, support dropped sharply when people were asked to 
contemplate attacks in their own country.)

Support for violence against civilians also decreased in Indonesia, which 
suffered a big decline in tourism after the Bali bombings of October 2002. 
Forty-five percent of Indonesians surveyed said they viewed Islamic extremism 
as posing a threat to their country. 

Still larger percentages in Morocco, Pakistan and Turkey said they viewed 
Islamic extremism as posing a very or fairly great threat to their country.

There was no consensus about the causes of Islamic extremism. Lebanese and 
Jordanians pointed to U.S. policies; Moroccans and Pakistanis to poverty and 
joblessness; Turks to lack of education; and Indonesians to immorality.

The polling was conducted in six predominantly Muslim countries - Indonesia, 
Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Pakistan and Turkey - and in Britain, Canada, China, 
France, Germany, India, the Netherlands, Poland, Russia, Spain and the United 
States. Margins of error ranged from plus or minus two percentage points to 
plus or minus four.

The responses amplified a Pew finding released in June showing that 
anti-American feelings have been declining in the Islamic world but that 
favorable feelings outnumber the unfavorable only in Morocco.

>From its findings in the Western world, the new report sketched more sharply 
>some of the fault lines in nations where Muslims and others coexist.

In almost every European country with a Muslim minority, a majority of 
respondents said they viewed Muslim immigrants as slow to accept and take on 
local values and customs, and they overwhelmingly viewed a growing sense of 
Islamic identity among Muslims in their countries as "a bad thing."

Nearly 9 in 10 Dutch respondents said Muslims in the Netherlands had a strong 
sense of Islamic identity. And almost 9 in 10 Germans said Muslims in their 
country wanted to remain distinct from the larger country, while only half of 
Americans said this about Muslims in the United States.

Paul Scheffer, a professor of urban sociology at the University of Amsterdam, 
said there was no doubt that the distance between Muslims and the rest of Dutch 
society was growing in the Netherlands. "It's not just a mood," he said. For 
Muslims, he added, "reaffirming their religious identity is also the result of 
not feeling at home."

Sizable majorities in every non-Muslim country except Poland said they were 
concerned about Islamic extremism in their own countries, the poll found.

Still, in Canada, the United States and Russia, majorities said they had very 
or somewhat favorable views of Muslims, as they did in France, with the largest 
Muslim population in Western Europe - about 10 percent of the total population 
of 60 million. 

Only in the Netherlands did a bare majority hold unfavorable views, as did 
nearly half of Germans. Majorities in Germany and the Netherlands said they 
held negative views of immigration from the Middle East and North Africa.

Many respondents in Muslim countries appeared to confirm the perceived 
separateness of societies, saying they see themselves first as Muslims, then as 
citizens of their country. 

In Europe, attitudes on Turkey's bid for European Union membership were shaped 
strongly by attitudes on immigration. Majorities in France, Germany, and the 
Netherlands said they opposed EU membership for Turkey, while majorities in 
Britain, Poland, Spain and Turkey itself were in favor.

"You cannot separate the issue of Turkey from domestic politics," said Cem 
Ozedmir, 39, a leading member of the German Greens party and member of the 
European Parliament. "There is a very important trend emerging and we see this 
in the Netherlands. Liberal-minded people who support gay rights and marriage 
have a feeling that Muslim identity, combined with Turkish accession to the EU, 
is putting into danger what the EU has achieved in their societies."

Johann Aguilar, 23, a newspaper vendor in Paris, said he opposed Turkish 
membership in the EU, in part because he worried about immigrants. "We have a 
lot of unemployment," he said, "and at one point it's inevitable to think that 
they are taking our jobs."

In the Muslim world, majorities saw Islam as playing a growing role in national 
politics. Majorities in most of the Muslim countries - 8 in 10 Moroccans, for 
example - termed it very important that Islam play a greater role in the world.

Polling in most Muslim countries found falling levels of confidence in Osama 
bin Laden, the leader of Al Qaeda. But in Jordan, confidence rose from 55 
percent two years ago to 60 percent, and in Pakistan, where bin Laden may have 
sheltered at times while eluding his pursuers, it rose from 45 percent to 51 
percent.

There was near-universal antipathy in the Muslim countries toward Jews. In 
Lebanon, a remarkable 99 percent of Muslims and Christians said they held a 
very unfavorable view of Jews; in Jordan, the figure was 100 percent. Views on 
Christians were not as absolute, ranging from 21 percent favorable in Turkey to 
91 percent favorable in Lebanon, which has a sizable Christian minority.

In Asia, views on religious groups were more moderate. In India, with its large 
Muslim minority, respondents divided nearly evenly on their attitudes to 
Muslims, with the favorable holding a slight edge; those favorable to 
Christians outnumbered the unfavorable by 3 to 1; more than half offered no 
opinion on Jews, but those who did had favorable views by about a 3-to-2 ratio. 

Additional reporting from Judy Dempsey in Berlin and Marlise Simons and Katrin 
Bennhold in Paris.

Full results of the Pew Global Attitudes Survey are available online at 
www.pewglobal.org. 

===============================================================

Reactions from around the world to the Pew findings:

http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/07/14/america/web.voices1.php 

INDONESIA

YUSUF WANANDI, 67 Co-founder of the Center for Strategic and International 
Studies, Jakarta.

AZYUMARDI AZRA, 50 Professor and president of the State Islamic University 
Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta (graduate of Columbia University, 1992).

ABIDIN, 35 He is a newspaper salesman

SISKA NUGROHO, 25 She is a computer programmer

SUKARDI, 55 He is a food stand vendor

+++++

QUESTION 1: The results of a Pew survey conducted this spring show that 45 
percent of respondents in Indonesia believe that Islamic extremism presents a 
great threat to the country. How do you interpret this result?

WANANDI It looks like the moderate Muslims in Indonesia are now grasping what 
extreme Islam is capable of. After the Bali bombings, the Marriott bombing and 
the Australian embassy bombing, people came to understand that extremism is a 
threat. If you talk to moderates about extreme groups before Bali, they really 
weren't worried about them, they thought that extreme groups were just acting 
up to express themselves, because they were so oppressed during Soharto's time. 
But after the bombings the people realized what extremism could create. 

AZRA I think that's not surprising, these radical groups are the most hated 
groups in Indonesia. A majority of the Muslims are moderate and they don't like 
violence. This comes from the early period of Islam in Indonesia— Indonesia 
Islam is very peaceful and very moderate, people do not like extremism. 

ABIDIN I don't think Islamic extremism is a great threat. It is a threat, but 
local extremists won't go too far because they do care about the people. A lot 
of people think it's a great threat because there are a lot of bomb scares and 
bomb threats are overhyped. Many of these bomb scares are connected to 
corruption cases, and not terrorist acts at all. People are taking advantage of 
the public's fear. 

NUGROHO I don't think there's a great threat from Islamic extremists. I am sad 
about the terrorist attacks but I'm not scared. It's going to get better; these 
attacks are not a usual part of life. Terrorist attacks are used as 
distractions — they are covering up real issues. 

SUKARDI Maybe people are scared because there have been more bomb threats here 
in the last few years. But I don't think there's a great threat. 

+++++

QUESTION 2: At the same time, the results show that the vast majority of 
Indonesians feel that Islam is playing a greater role in political life, and 
most welcome that development. The reason most often cited for Islam's 
increasing role in politics is growing immorality in Indonesian society. Please 
comment on this.

WANANDI Religion is playing a greater role in politics because of the 
globalization process. Globalization has made new values and new cultures that 
are starting to penetrate Indonesia. The changes are so quick, and so drastic, 
that of course this creates problems. Many people cannot cope with this change, 
and in order to create certainty in their life they turn back to values they 
know, such as religious ones. It's a defense mechanism that is not exclusive to 
Muslim culture.

AZRA The increase in religious conservatism is a global phenomenon, not only in 
Indonesia. In the U.S. there is rising religious conservatism, or in India. But 
it's not reflected in politics that much, the parties who won the election are 
not religious parties. Some Islamic parties joined the secular parties. In 
2004, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, who was the leader of the Democratic party, was 
supported by Islamic Justice and Welfare Party. So there's a lot of coalition. 
There's no significant impact of Islam on political parties. 

ABIDIN I don't think Islam has a great influence in the political field.

NUGROHO Yes, people are starting to turn towards religion because of the 
growing sense of moral degradation; there seem to be extremists and other bad 
influences around. People are worried and paying closer attention to Islam. 
It's not about Western globalization; I'm not worried about that. 

SUKARDI Yes, a lot of people put religion in politics now, but I'm not sure 
why. I don't understand because I sell food and I don't care to learn about 
politics. 

+++++

QUESTION 3: Fifteen percent of Indonesian respondents now say violence against 
civilians in defense of Islam is often or sometimes justified, down from 27 
percent in 2002. What explains this drop in support for acts of terrorism?

WANANDI This is related to the first question. They are now aware that 
extremist acts affect everyone, including innocent Muslims. No one can condone 
that. People understand that if these extremist acts can be condoned by 
society, then the whole society is extreme.

AZRA I think that these people realized that Islam alone does not condone any 
kind of violence. I think it is because some of the victims have also been 
Muslims, like the attack in London or Sept. 11. Especially the Indonesian 
bombings, many victims were Muslim. Less and less people can justify violence 
and terrorist activity. 

ABIDIN I think people are starting to see the negative impacts of terrorism. 
People see that terrorism hurts our tourism industry and people will not come 
here if they are scared. People know we can't fight violence with violence, and 
Islam does not teach violence. 

NUGROHO Maybe people did not really understand terrorism at first, but after 
the bombings, people see the affects.

SUKARDI People are less supportive of terrorist attacks because we know what 
terrorism does, we're afraid of attacks. 

++++++++++

PAKISTAN

HUSAIN HAQQANI, 48 Professor of international relations at Boston University. 
He has just published the book ''Pakistan: Between Mosque and Military'' 
(Carnegie Endowment, 2005)

MUDASIR TIPU, 35 He is a government employee in Islamabad

SAIMA SHIRAZI, 29 She works as a marketing consultant for state-owned 
television in Islamabad

AYESHA HAMID, 48 A housewife from Rawalpindi

+++++

QUESTION 1: The results of a Pew survey conducted this spring show that 52 
percent of respondents in Pakistan believe that Islamic extremism presents a 
great threat to the country. How do you interpret this result?

HAQQANI Pakistani public opinion has generally never been in favor of Islamist 
extremism. Pakistanis have demonstrated their preference for moderate leaders 
in general elections whenever they have been given an opportunity to do so... 
Islamist extremism in Pakistan has flourished in the past under state 
patronage, with the military-intelligence machinery seeking to control policy 
with the help of extremists. Now that state patronage for extremists has 
declined, and state propaganda painting them as freedom fighters has ceased, 
public opinion is reasserting itself in favor of moderation.

TIPU I believe that it is a threat certainly as it presents very real dangers 
to the stability of the state, which is already extremely vulnerable. My 
biggest concern is that it is the perpetuation of these acts that should be a 
matter of serious concern. Despite the fact that a war on terror is going on 
mercilessly, there is a vicious cycle in which violence is breeding violence. 

SHIRAZI Extremism poses a danger to the communal sanity of Pakistan. I think we 
should let democracy rule and let everyone be happy. Where nobody pushes anyone 
around, no fundamentalists, no fanatics, whether religious or not. 

HAMID How can our religion be a cause of danger? Islam teaches kindness and 
love for humanity. Islam is moderation, not extremists. Extremists are not real 
Muslims. They just give us a bad name.

+++++

QUESTION 2: At the same time, the results show that many Pakistanis feel that 
Islam is playing a greater role in political life, and most welcome that 
development. The reason most often cited for Islam's increasing role in 
politics is dissatisfaction with the current Pakistani government. Please 
comment on this.

HAQQANI When Pakistanis say they want a greater role for Islam they usually 
mean they want greater morality. There is no evidence that Pakistanis support 
the perspective of Islamist parties, who managed to get only 11 percent of the 
popular vote in the 2002 parliamentary elections even though major secular 
leaders were kept out of the election by General Musharraf and the Islamist 
alliance had the field to itself... Pakistanis are clearly disenchanted with 
military rule, and one reason of their stated support for Islam might be that 
they see the Islamists as opposing Musharraf more openly than the secular 
opposition... The secular opposition finds itself in a bind. In demanding 
democracy, it is opposed to Musharraf, but in supporting moderation and 
opposing religious extremism it shares Musharraf's stated positions.

TIPU I hardly see Islam being used as a weapon by the incumbent government; in 
fact it is quite secular. It shares the views of Kemal Ataturk and a deliberate 
attempt is being made to change many laws which are conceived to be rooted in 
Islamic philosophy. 

SHIRAZI I think the present government is agreeable to the world at large and 
it is a good thing. Personally, I think religion and politics should be kept 
separate. 

HAMID Politicians have indulged in corruption. Islamic parties are comprised of 
pious people, who follow the word of Allah. It is a good thing. People would 
believe a person who follows Islam more than a corrupt politician. 

+++++

QUESTION 3: Twenty-five percent of Pakistani respondents now say violence 
against civilians in defense of Islam is often or sometimes justified, down 
from 41 percent in 2004. What explains this drop in support for acts of 
terrorism?

HAQQANI Pakistanis have experienced terrorism first-hand in the last few years 
and that may have something with the decline in support for terrorism. Also, 
the state propaganda that eulogized militants fighting in Kashmir as freedom 
fighters has declined and the brutality of terrorism is now openly discussed in 
the Pakistani media. All this is clearly influencing Pakistani public opinion. 
One must remember that public opinion changes. If people see excessive force 
being used against Muslim civilians in Iraq, Kashmir or Afghanistan, the 
pendulum may yet swing in the other direction.

TIPU Well, I think there are two reasons: a) the West, by the sheer power of 
its media, its economic resources and its diplomatic clout, has developed an 
image in which terrorism is being repeatedly denigrated so that is creating a 
psychological response, which is not lasting, as a matter of fact, and might 
dissipate; and b) the people realized that terrorism is becoming a part of 
their daily lives and if it continues to go on, it can lead to greater economic 
costs.

SHIRAZI Violence can never be justified. 

HAMID The killing of innocent civilians is wrong. Now there is more realization 
in people that such a thing in the name of Islam is wrong and not acceptable. 

++++++++++

LEBANON

NIZAR HAMZA, 50 Professor of political science at the American University of 
Beirut

HASSAN, 31 Bank employee (he declined to disclose his surname)

SARA BADREDDINE, 27 Primary school teacher

+++++

QUESTION 1: The results of a Pew survey conducted this spring show that 26 
percent of respondents in Lebanon believe that Islamic extremism presents a 
great threat to the country. How do you interpret this result?

HAMZA This is a reasonable percentage and a reflection of what goes on in 
people's minds.

HASSAN That's understandable. It's a reasonable number. The Lebanese are known 
for being sympathetic to ''jihad,'' or resistance — not terrorism, there's a 
difference — but with the series of bombings that has been happening in 
Lebanon, it has become more of a reality for people here. Innocent people are 
dying.

BADREDDINE This result is explained by the fact that the words used are 
misleading. Extremism in any religion is wrong, but using the word Islam in 
this case will produce a low result. You have to ask terrorism, or terrorists, 
not Islamic extremism. Saying that, I believe Islamic extremism is dangerous to 
the country not because of bombs or terror attacks, but because it prevents the 
advent of technology and modernism.

+++++

QUESTION 2: This percentage is substantially lower than in every other Islamic 
country surveyed except Jordan. In addition, there is a big divide along 
religious lines, with 53 percent of Christian respondents but only 4 percent of 
Muslim respondents seeing Islamic extremism as a great threat to Lebanon. 
Please comment.

HAMZA Naturally, that is also reasonable if you look at Lebanon's demographics. 
Christians here are more threatened of Islamists being in power and would 
believe that. But Muslims here, being the majority, don't feel threatened by 
Islamic extremism and are more sympathetic to Islamic groups.

HASSAN Of course Christians here will feel it is more of a threat as they are a 
minority. Christians have always felt threatened by Muslims in Lebanon.

BADREDDINE This is the same. There's a misinterpretation of the terrorism when 
you use the words Islamic extremism. Islam and terror do not go hand in hand. 
On the contrary, Islam preaches peace, not terror. If you take out the word 
Islamic before extremism the results would be completely different. Especially 
in this region and especially in this country, where: a) the majority of the 
population is Muslim and b) you have a resistance group (Hezbollah) to whom the 
people feel loyalty because of its ability to end Israeli occupation. But the 
Christian/Muslim factor is natural. The Christians did not live the Israeli 
occupation in the same way the Muslims in south Lebanon did. So Muslims in this 
country have a certain loyalty to Hezbollah and its role as a resistance group.

+++++

QUESTION 3: At the same time, the results show that many Lebanese feel that 
Islam is playing a greater role in political life these days. The reason most 
often cited is concern about Western influences in Lebanon. Please comment.

HAMZA Again it's a reflection of the current phase in politics with Islamic 
parties gaining more power. Islamists' role has grown over the years. 
Hezbollah, Jihad, Hamas (in the Palestinian camps) have come to be more 
influential.

HASSAN Muslims are more in power now. Especially Hezbollah and Amal. And after 
February 14 [the assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri] the 
Sunnis are also stronger. Christians have to unite with them.

BADREDDINE These are very misleading questions. Again it's not Islam which is 
playing a bigger role in politics. Political parties, which preach Islam, are 
gaining political power. They use the umbrella of Islam. 

+++++

QUESTION 4: Thirty-nine percent of Lebanese respondents now say violence 
against civilians in defense of Islam is often or sometimes justified, down 
from 73 percent in 2002. What explains this drop in support for acts of 
terrorism?

HAMZA In Lebanon, because of the sectarian makeup of the country, asking one 
sect would generate a very different answer from asking another sect. E.g. ask 
Shiites or Sunnis, and you may have an actual rise in percentage, not decrease. 
Christians may give another answer. The Lebanese, after what happened in Iraq 
and Gaza, West Bank and even now what is happening in the south with Hezbollah, 
are more sympathetic to resistance or jihad, and would not term it as violence. 
Violence does not define what the question really is, as they do not believe 
this is violence rather than resistance against an occupying or oppressing 
force.

HASSAN There is no such thing as violence against civilians in defense of 
Islam. The wording is misleading. What is happening in Iraq, the UK, in the 
U.S., is not violence against civilians in defense of Islam. It is resistance 
against occupation. This whole question is wrong.

BADREDDINE The drop is basically explained because people (including Muslims) 
are shying away from terrorist attacks. Again, do not equate terrorism with 
Islamic extremism. 

++++++++++

GERMANY

HEINZ KRAMER, 60 Research director for European Union foreign policy at the 
German Institute for International Policy and Security in Berlin. CEM OZEDMIR, 
39 A leading member of the German Greens party and member of the European 
Parliament. Born in Germany of Turkish parents.

JULIA HAUSSNER, 42 Piano teacher in Berlin.

+++++

QUESTION 1: The results of a Pew survey conducted this spring show that 66 
percent of respondents in Germany believe that there is a growing sense of 
Islamic identity among Muslims in the country, and that 85 percent of those 
believe this is a bad thing. How do you interpret this result?

KRAMER The results indicate many things. First, that people do take note of 
media coverage of the issue. On the other hand, people do not really think 
about their personal experiences with their Muslim neighborhood — that is, if 
they have one. In addition, people in Germany prefer to live in a socially 
homogenous society. The general decline of Islam's reputation in Europe as one 
of the acknowledged great religions of the world has also taken place in 
Germany. There is another factor. The German policy of "integration" of 
foreigners seems to have failed with respect to Muslims. The process of 
European integration seems to have created a strong Eurocentric understanding 
of societal openness — there is a clear idea of a culture "fortress Europe" in 
the minds of these people.

OZDEMIR The problem is expectations, not only in Germany but in other countries 
in Europe. There is the attitude that the more secular you become, the more you 
are a "good citizen." Its very complicated. If society expects a Muslim not to 
be a Muslim, but a good citizen, we have a problem. There is a big ambiguity 
over religious identity. The more secular a society becomes, say like Germany, 
you wonder how tolerant and understanding it is of religious identity. 
September 11 changed a lot. Islam was seen as non-modern. If people go to a 
mosque, they are seen as non-modern. This is a danger. 

HAUSSNER I see more head scarves. I feel this is not a good thing. A part of 
the Muslim population keeps more apart than before. I thought it would only be 
a matter of time before the Turks would integrate. You hear more too about 
honor killings. They don't have to be like us. It starts to be difficult when 
everyone has their own laws. There is a sense of drifting apart, as if 
splitting the society.

+++++

QUESTION 2: At the same time, the results show that an overwhelming majority of 
Germans feel that Muslims in the country want to be distinct from the larger 
society, and only 9 percent believe they want to adopt German ways. Please 
comment.

KRAMER This result gives the impression that "social integration" is seen as a 
task that has predominantly to be fulfilled by the Muslims, not by the German 
polity. In a certain way, this result is a confirmation of the findings of 
question 1. OZDEMIR This is a self-fulfilling prophecy. You get what you want. 
It takes generations of immigrants to establish their identity. What is German 
society expecting? Look at the system of dual nationality which it allows in 
some cases. It is meaningful to have two or more identities. Society is not 
very clear on this. The view in Germany is that the less roots have you in your 
original country, the more you have integrated.

HAUSSNER It's difficult. Who are the Muslims? In the economic sphere, they are 
integrated. I think a recognizable part of the Muslim people want to be 
distinct. The question is wrong because there are many different kinds of 
Muslims. My friend has married a Muslim from Syria. She can still wear a short 
skirt. And her mother-in-law does not wear a head scarf. Yes, a big part of 
Muslims want to be distinct. This does not mean total separation.

+++++

QUESTION 3: Sixty-five percent of German respondents oppose Turkish membership 
in the EU, and of those about three-quarters also see immigration from the 
Middle East, North Africa and Eastern Europe as a bad thing. Are attitudes 
about immigration and national identity affecting Turkey's membership bid? 
KRAMER They definitely do so. The position of the Christian Democrats but also 
of a majority of the Liberals and a majority of Social Democratic grass roots 
towards Turkey's accession process ot the EU is informed by these attitudes. 

OZDEMIR You cannot separate the issue of Turkey from domestic politics. There 
is a very important trend emerging and we see this in the Netherlands. The 
liberal-minded people who support gay rights and marriage have a feeling that 
Muslim identity combined with Turkish accession to the EU is putting into 
danger what the EU has achieved in their societies. In other words, the 
liberals are saying that the sexual/gender issues, the honor killings, the head 
scarves, these could become the lifestyle if it continues like this. This is a 
trend taking place. It is a new trend among the liberal middle classes. Also 
one other trend to think about: Liberals actually send their children to church 
schools in places in Germany where there are many immigrants. There are fewer 
immigrants in these schools. You like to live in these neighborhoods but you 
don't want your children to go to their schools.

HAUSSNER As for the immigration issue, it depends who is coming. Many are not 
qualified. They think there is a better life here. They will be looked after. 
They have to be fed. The fear is not that many Turks will come to Germany if 
Turkey joins the EU. It's something else as well. The liberals feel that their 
liberal values will be undermined; that they will be changed.

+++++

QUESTION 4: A Pew survey conducted this spring showed that 78 percent of German 
respondents were somewhat or very concerned about Islamic extremism in Germany. 
In light of the London bombings, do you expect fears of Islamic extremism in 
Germany to rise?

KRAMER This will, most likely, be the case it the short term. They will 
definitely not go down. OZDEMIR There will be so many different ambiguities. It 
depends on what takes place in Turkey and how the political parties respond.

HAUSSNER I'm not sure if Islamic terrorism is coming from Muslims inside 
Germany. Its coming from people who study here for a few years and are mobile. 
Also, there is still a feeling here that it [the terrorist attacks] won't 
happen here. As for the fear increasing, yes. I guess so.

++++++++++

FRANCE

OLIVIER ROY, 55 Senior research fellow at the CNRS, the French National 
Scientific Research Institute, and author of ''Globalized Islam'' (Columbia 
University Press, 2004)

CHRISTOPHE BERTOSSI, 34 Specialist on immigration at the French Institute of 
International Relations in Paris.

JOHANN AGUILAR, 23 Newspaper vendor in central Paris KATHERINE VERDOT, 44 Has 
an antique stall at the Clignancourt flea market in Paris

+++++

QUESTION 1: The results of a Pew survey conducted this spring show that 70 
percent of respondents in France believe that there is a growing sense of 
Islamic identity among Muslims in the country, and that 89 percent of those 
believe this is a bad thing. How do you interpret this result?

ROY There is definitely a growing assertiveness of Islamic religious identity 
in France and in Europe. This is wrongly attributed to a comeback of a 
''cultural'' Middle Eastern identity, while in fact it is a consequence of the 
disconnect between religion and culture. Muslims want to be recognized as 
''Muslims,'' not as ''Arabs'' or immigrants. In this sense, the way Islam 
reasserts itself has more to do with the Christian ''born-agains'' than with a 
pristine Arabic culture. The sense of threat among French public opinion (which 
by the way is also directed towards cults like Scientology) comes from the fact 
that the French political culture is based on the rejection of religion from 
the public sphere, whatever the religion. Any religious assertiveness is seen 
as a threat.

BERTOSSI The international context with the Iraq war, the fight against 
terrorism and the second Intifada, along with the recent debates in France, 
since the winter of 2003, on secularism and the creation of the National 
Council for the Muslim Religion, have nourished the feeling that Islam was 
French society's main problem, along with unemployment and clandestine 
immigration. Moreover, this finding of a growing sense of Islamic identity is 
often more the fruit of the way so-called Muslim populations are seen -- not 
all of which, by the way, are practicing Muslims -- than of they way they see 
themselves. As a result of being categorized according to their adherence to 
Islam, France's communities of immigrants from North Africa are defined as 
ethnic populations, i.e. most often as 'inferior' communities. Opinions about 
this are reinforced by reports in the media, in which Islam is automatically 
perceived as a challenge, and by political discourse which often fans the 
flames of
 prejudice. We thus have a series of themes that are wrongly associated: 
communitarism, discrimination, Islamophobia, anti-Semitism, secularism, the 
fight against Islamism, and problems of integration. ... This often masks the 
reality of discrimination experienced by Muslim populations in this context in 
which Muslim identity, that is assumed to be fixed, is necessarily considered 
to be a problem.

+++++

QUESTION 2: At the same time, the results show that nearly 60 percent feel that 
Muslims in France want to be distinct from the larger society, while 36 percent 
believe they want to adopt French ways. Please comment.

ROY Perception is not reality. The intellectual perception about Islam is based 
on the idea of an alleged Muslim ''separatism,'' the idea that Islam is an 
obstacle to integration, while the concrete interactions of individual 
''French'' people with ''Muslims'' show to many French that most Muslims are 
willing to integrate. Hence the discrepancy between issues relating to 
''Islam'' and issues relating to one's ''Muslim neighbor'' (''my Muslim 
neighbor is O.K., the others are not'').

BERTOSSI This result illustrates two thing, which are linked. First, the 
majority perception in France that the new problem of integration does not 
concern immigrants in general, but Muslims in particular, despite the fact that 
the latter are no longer immigrants but French citizens and, most often, by 
birth. Second, the parallel percecption that the Muslims of France are unlikely 
to be French citizens like everyone else precisely because of the Muslim 
identity, real or imagined. Adherence to Islam becomes a 'color bar' in France.

VERDOT Muslims in France are seen as people who want to impose their religion 
on others. It's true that their search for an identity seems to have become a 
lot more pronounced, especially in the younger generations. Sometimes it annoys 
me, too. When I go to Sri Lanka and visit a temple I have to put on a veil. Why 
don't they adapt to our culture here?

+++++

QUESTION 3: Sixty-six percent of French respondents oppose Turkish membership 
in the EU, and of those about four-fifths also see immigration from the Middle 
East, North Africa and Eastern Europe as a bad thing. Are attitudes about 
immigration and national identity affecting Turkey's membership bid?

ROY Yes. For good or bad reasons the debate on Turkey epitomizes the debate on 
Islam and immigration. Although it is probable that after integration into the 
EU the level of Turkish immigration to Europe will drop: let's remember the 
fear of an influx of millions of people from the former communist bloc after 
1991.

BERTOSSI Turkish entry to the EU is crystalizing opinions of people who are 
finding a visible ''foreigner'' to oppose, with the fear of loss of identity 
that, moreover, goes beyond the French context and concerns various European 
countries (U.K., Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, Switzerland, etc.). It is in 
this context that the latest reform of the French Constitution, which took 
place before the referendum on the European constitutional treaty, stipulates 
that the next enlargements of the European Union will be put to the French via 
referendum. This of course is aimed at Turkey. France's no to the European 
Constitution on May 29 made this point still more sensitive. Even if the two 
are not directly linked, the French national identity crisis with regard to its 
Muslim minority, the social and economic crisis dominated by heavy 
unemployment, the crisis of the French citizenship model versus so-called 
'communitarism' (head scarves, forced marriage, etc.), the crisis of European
 construction with a negative experience of enlargement by 10 (and soon 12) new 
member states — all this contributes to reinforcing the anti-immigrant 
discourse, strongly based on a whiff of nationalism, from the ''Polish 
plumber'' to the ''Muslim'' immigrant. The transition to globalization, if it 
takes effect in reality, is being experienced negatively by people, and the 
result is that different identities enter into conflict: national identity 
versus ''others,'' whether immigrants or Turkey in the prospect of EU 
enlargement. Europe's desire has changed: It is no longer the project of the 
''founding fathers'' but a desire for borders closed to immigration, including 
within an expanded European Union; for security; and for a clear-cut identity.

AGUILAR I'm against Turkey in the EU — it's a question of culture but it's also 
a question of democrcy and human rights. They don't know what women's rights 
are, for example. I'm not against all immigration — the Africans really work 
very hard and I respect that. I worked in a factory before and saw how they 
worked. But you have to limit it. We have a lot of unemployment and at one 
point it's inevitable to think that they are taking our jobs.

+++++

QUESTION 4: The survey showed that 73 percent of French respondents were 
somewhat or very concerned about Islamic extremism in France. In light of the 
London bombings, do you expect fears of Islamic extremism in France to rise?

ROY It would be difficult to have more than 73 percent of French public opinion 
being afraid of Islam if we take into account the fact that there are between 5 
to 8 percent of Muslims in France, plus a number of mixed couples and families, 
plus leftists and liberals, plus social workers, plus tourists enjoying weeks 
of leisure in Muslim countries. The threat mentioned by the 73 percent doesn't 
really relate to Muslims living in France but to an abstract perception of the 
''Islamic threat.''

AGUILAR I'm not surprised at all that so many people are worried about rising 
extremism. We all saw what happened in London. First New York, then Madrid and 
now London. What if Paris is next? Now when I take the metro I am actually a 
bit worried. I'm afraid, but I'm also annoyed because some of the Muslims in 
France are becoming very feisty. Like when they whistled and booed during the 
Marseillaise during a football match between France and Algeria last year. 
They're in our country because they don't want to be in their own, but they 
criticize France and more and more of the young ones are now parading their 
Muslim identity.

VERDOT The French have long feared the opening to other cultures, they are a 
very racist people. They have no problems with Dutch, German or British 
immigrants, but a different color and a differnt religion are still real 
barriers for most people. Such sentiment is bound to increase after the London 
attacks — that's natural perhaps but I find it really sad.

++++++++++

NETHERLANDS

PAUL SCHEFFER, 50 Professor of urban sociology, University of Amsterdam. Has 
published extensively on immigration and integration problems.

PETER PAUL SPANJAARD, 26 Lawyer

+++++

QUESTION 1: The results of a Pew survey conducted this spring show that 60 
percent of respondents in the Netherlands believe that there is a growing sense 
of Islamic identity among Muslims in the country, and that 87 percent of those 
believe this is a bad thing. How do you interpret this result?

SCHEFFER This is an observation which I share. Certainly since Sept. 11 there 
is a growing emphasis among Muslims on faith, also among young people. There is 
a growing distance between them and the rest of Dutch society. The emphasis on 
religious symbols is stronger. It's not just a mood. It has been confirmed by 
independent research among Moslims that there is greater use of religious 
symbolism. [Re 87 percent believe it's a bad thing]: This points to a growing 
alienation from Dutch society, that people are feeling rejected, feeling 
uneasy. The stronger sense of Muslim identity is also brought about by this 
greater distance from Dutch society. If you put that question to Muslims they 
will basically say the same: that reaffirming their religious identity is also 
the result of not feeling at home. Religion perhaps has become the only source 
of self-respect. It reflects a malaise in Dutch society, that there is not 
enough capacity to integrate or willingness to integrate. It's also a
 reflection of the growing sense of distrust. There is a widespread feeling of 
uneasiness on both sides, among the Dutch and the Muslims. Younger people at 
the university tell me all the time they never feel quite accepted. 

SPANJAARD Yes, there is that growing sense of Muslim identity. But we have to 
blame ourselves because we have singled them out as a different group. But it's 
worrying if they want to keep their own lifestyle. because it means they dont 
want to participate in dutch society. It means the gap will become bigger.

+++++

QUESTION 2: At the same time, the results show that nearly two-thirds feel that 
Muslims in the Netherlands want to be distinct from the larger society, while 
about a third believe they want to adopt Dutch ways. Please comment.

SCHEFFER The most orthodox Muslims tell their fellow believers: Either you are 
a good Muslim and keep your distance from the Dutch ways, or you integrate and 
corrupt your faith. There is a large group of Muslims that does not agree with 
this view. It presents a choice of opposites, either you integrate or remain 
part of your religion; either you stay aloof or you corrupt your faith. Many 
Muslims do not want to make this choice. What do the orthodox mean: that people 
must reject the basic values of an open liberal society, or does it mean that 
they should visit the mosque regularly, wear the headscarf? So people wonder if 
it is possible to be a Dutch Muslim. The most orthodox preachers and believers 
want a cohesive Muslim community which they can control

SPANJAARD The important question is what the young people want to do. If the 
older generation wants to be different, well maybe we can't expect them to 
change or to adapt. But if the young people want to be different and separate, 
then we get cultural ghettos. 

+++++

QUESTION 3: Fifty-three percent of Dutch respondents oppose Turkish membership 
in the EU, and of those about two-thirds also see immigration from the Middle 
East, North Africa and Eastern Europe as a bad thing. Are attitudes about 
immigration and national identity affecting Turkey's membership bid?

SCHEFFER Yes, like in France, the rejection of Turkey's bid for membership 
definitely played a role in the no vote against the constitution. People in 
Holland have for a long time been concerned about the fast immigration, and 
their experiences with Muslim immigrants play a role in their view of Turkey's 
membership. Two-thirds of the Dutch oppose more immigration, because people 
feel uncontrolled immigration has been too fast and gone too far. Crime rates 
among Moroccan and to a lesser extent Turkish youths has been high. There has 
been high segregation in schools. There has been a build-up because until Sept. 
11, the mainstream political parties have refused to debate it. Now the 
antagonism has come out in the open. This a necessary phase of a more open, 
more realistic debate. People are coming to terms with the fact that Islam is 
now the second largest religion in the country, that Islam is here to stay. 
Immigrants had long lived with the illusion of returning. We have now entered
 a phase of facing reality. 

SPANJAARD Yes, people link everything together, Islam, terrorism, more 
immigrants, more crime. But the real issue with having Turkey in the EU is its 
large size, which means it will have a lot of influence. It could change what 
Europe is, or wants to be.

+++++

QUESTION 4: The survey showed that 76 percent of Dutch respondents were 
somewhat or very concerned about Islamic extremism in the Netherlands. In light 
of the London bombings, do you expect fears of Islamic extremism in the 
Netherlands to rise?

SCHEFFER The worry about Islamic extremism was already high before the London 
bombings. I wouldn't call it fear but a reflection of reality. People really 
take into account what the government has repeatedly said, namely that the 
chance is great that there will be an attack, The secret service says it has 
already foiled several plots to attack. So it's not a question of if, but when 
and where. People will not be surprised. There has been New York, Madrid, 
London — the chance is coming closer and closer.

SPANJAARD Maybe there's more fear. It's surprising how quickly people stopped 
talking about it. But yes, there is a sense that it may be our turn.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



***************************************************************************
Berdikusi dg Santun & Elegan, dg Semangat Persahabatan. Menuju Indonesia yg 
Lebih Baik, in Commonality & Shared Destiny. http://www.ppi-india.org
***************************************************************************
__________________________________________________________________________
Mohon Perhatian:

1. Harap tdk. memposting/reply yg menyinggung SARA (kecuali sbg otokritik)
2. Pesan yg akan direply harap dihapus, kecuali yg akan dikomentari.
3. Lihat arsip sebelumnya, http://dear.to/ppi 
4. Satu email perhari: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5. No-email/web only: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6. kembali menerima email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Kirim email ke