Cluster Bombs Are Not Good for Children, Hillary
(Ditto for Landmines and Sanctions)
By Paul Rockwell
13/03/08 "Commondreams" -- - The human soul is difficult to fathom. One person 
alone is capable of both compassion and cruelty.
In her autobiography, Living History, Senator Hillary Clinton portrays herself 
as an advocate for children, a defender of women and human rights. In fact, the 
Clintons have a long history of sacrificing the rights, even the lives of 
children, for political expediency. It is time to set the record straight.
On September 6, 2006, a Senate bill–a simple amendment to ban the use of 
cluster bombs in civilian areas–presented Senator Clinton with a timely 
opportunity to protect the lives of children throughout the world.

The cluster bomb is one of the most hated and heinous weapons in modern war, 
and its primary victims are children.
Senator Obama voted for the amendment to ban cluster bombs. Senator Clinton, 
however, voted with the Republicans to kill the humanitarian bill, an amendment 
in accord with the Geneva Conventions, which already prohibit the use of 
indiscriminate weapons in populated areas.

All senators are expected to inform themselves on the issues before they cast a 
vote. The evidence is overwhelming. It is hard to believe that Senator Clinton 
was unaware of the humanitarian crisis when she voted to continue the use of 
cluster bombs in cities and populated areas. A U.N. weapons commission called 
cluster bombs “weapons of indiscriminate effect.” For years the international 
press reported the horrific consequences of cluster bombs on civilians. On 
April 10, 2003, for example, Asia Times described the carnage in Baghdad 
hospitals: “The absolute majority of patients are women and children, victims 
of shrapnel, and most of all, fragments of cluster bombs.” Reporting from a 
hospital in Hillah, The Mirror, a British newspaper, became graphic: “Shrapnel 
peppered their bodies. Blackened the skin. 
Smashed heads. Tore limbs. A doctor reports that ‘all the injuries you see were 
caused by cluster bombs. The majority of the victims were children who died 
because they were outside.’”

Even after wars subside, after treaties are signed, after belligerents return 
home, cluster bombs wreak havoc on civilian life. Up to 20 percent of the 
bomblets fail to detonate on the first round, only to become landmines that 
later explode on playgrounds and farmlands. Children are drawn to cluster bomb 
canisters, the deadly duds that look like beer cans or toys before they explode.

Clinton on Landmines

Of course Senator Clinton did not expect her vote on cluster bombs to become an 
issue in a presidential campaign. But that vote is one of many examples in a 
pattern of indifference to the welfare of children in the Developing World.

Because Clinton is now taking credit for the White House years, when she was a 
partner in power, we should also look closely at the Clinton policy regarding 
landmines, an issue of great concern to parents, to all those who care for 
children. The U.S. is the leading manufacturer of landmines. For families 
across the rest of the globe, landmines are buried terror. More than 100 
million landmines are deployed in over 60 countries worldwide–nine million in 
Angola, 10 million in Cambodia. About 20,000 M14 antipersonnel mines are buried 
in the mountain areas of Yong-do, South Korea. According to U.N. estimates, 
26,000 people, mostly civilians in developing countries, are killed or 
mutilated by landmines every year. In rural areas landmines are so ubiquitous 
and lethal, peasants risk their lives to earn a living tilling the soil and 
planting crops.

The worldwide movement to ban landmines burgeoned in the Clinton years. It was 
a visionary U.S. citizen, Jody Williams of Vermont, who won the Nobel Peace 
Prize for her efforts to end the ignominy of landmines. And it was primarily in 
defense of children that Princess Diana, speaking from a minefield in Angola, 
raised international awareness about devastation caused by weapons from the 
West.
In December 1997, 137 nations, more than two-thirds of the world, signed the 
Ottawa treaty, an agreement to ban the use, production, stockpiling and 
transfer of anti-personnel landmines. How did the Clintons respond to world 
opinion, to the humanitarian movement against landmines?
President Clinton flat out refused to become party to the Ottawa convention. As 
he put it, “I could not sign in good conscience the treaty banning landmines.” 
In “good conscience”?! Are landmines good for children?

The Clinton Sanctions Were Calamitous

Senator Clinton is currently trying to build a campaign around her experience 
in the White House, but she refuses to take responsibility for the most 
inhumane and disastrous foreign policy operation of the Clinton years: the 
infamous economic sanctions against Iraq. The sanctions, a colossal failure, 
formed the centerpiece of Clinton foreign policy. While the sanctions began 
with Bush senior in 1990, they were carried out and enforced with a vengeance 
by the Clinton Administration. The second war against Iraq actually began long 
before George Bush launched the shock-and-awe bombings in 2003. The Clinton 
sanctions afflicted the entire Iraqi population. Child mortality, as well as 
the death rate for the elderly and the chronically ill, skyrocketed. 
Malnutrition debilitated the country. Irrigation and sanitation systems 
collapsed. Common diseases multiplied. The Iraqi medical services, the most 
advanced medical system in the Mideast prior to the sanctions,
 fell apart. Farmers ran out of fertilizers and machine parts. Thousands of 
trained professionals fled the country. The sanctions, combined with surprise 
bombing raids, destroyed the entire infrastructure.
As the full magnitude of the calamity became public knowledge, humanitarian 
organizations, like Voices in the Wilderness, made appeals to the White House. 
Denis Halliday, former U.N. Humanitarian Coordinator for Iraq, resigned in 
protest in 1998. (His successor, H.C. von Sponeck, later resigned as well). 
Contemptuous of human rights and world opinion, President Clinton blocked 
Russian and French proposals to end the sanctions.

The Premise of Foreign Policy

It was Madeline Albright, Clinton’s Secretary of State, who fully revealed the 
Clinton Administration’s cold indifference to human rights. In her notorious 
interview on national TV with Leslie Stahl, Albright said that Clinton policy 
objectives were worth the sacrifice of half a million Arab children, children 
who were dying of disease and malnutrition as she spoke. For the record, 
Albright did not deny that half a million children under the age of five 
perished as the result of sanctions. When Stahl asked: “Is the price worth it?” 
Albright said without qualification: “We think the price is worth it.”

Half a million children under five is a genocidal number. Of course, Albright 
was talking about Arab children, not Europeans. Had she made a similar remark 
about British or German children, she would have been fired and denounced 
within an hour. Albright’s candid statement uncovered the essentially racist 
view of Arabs common among foreign policy experts–all men and women of 
experience, to be sure–in Washington.
The premise of U.S. foreign policy under Clinton and Bush is unmistakable: Arab 
peoples have no rights which the U.S. is bound to respect.
When historians sum up the sanguine events between 1992 and 2008, Clinton’s 
economic sanctions against Iraq and the Bush occupation of Iraq will be grouped 
together as part of a single, catastrophic process.

Senator Clinton has never disavowed the sanctions or the racist attitudes that 
made them possible. In fact, she is now calling for sanctions against another 
country in the Mideast–Iran.
I have no doubt that Senator Clinton is sincere when she promotes domestic 
programs for children–projects to reduce childhood obesity, plans to curtail 
teenage smoking. And like Obama, she advocates full health care insurance for 
all American children. All well and good.

But it is clear from her record–her voting record and her White House 
experience–that Senator Clinton, like her husband, does not measure human 
rights by one yardstick. The lives of Arab and Iranian children are measured on 
a different scale. We need a president who cares for all God’s children, not 
just the white kids depicted in her Red Phone ad.
It is not experience itself, but the capacity to learn from experience, that 
should determine who should lead, and who should be deprived of power over the 
lives of others.

Paul Rockwell is a national columnist living in the Bay Area. ([EMAIL 
PROTECTED])

 
Satrio Arismunandar 
Producer "SISI LAIN" (tayang Senin-Jumat, pukul 13.30-14.00 WIB) - 
News Division, Trans TV, Lantai 3
Jl. Kapten P. Tendean Kav. 12 - 14 A, Jakarta 12790 
Phone: 7917-7000, 7918-4544 ext. 4023,  Fax: 79184558, 79184627
 
http://satrioarismunandar6.blogspot.com
http://satrioarismunandar.multiply.com  
 
"Ungkapkanlah kebenaran itu, meskipun pahit" (Hadist Nabi)


 
 


      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------

***************************************************************************
Berdikusi dg Santun & Elegan, dg Semangat Persahabatan. Menuju Indonesia yg 
Lebih Baik, in Commonality & Shared Destiny. 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia
***************************************************************************
__________________________________________________________________________
Mohon Perhatian:

1. Harap tdk. memposting/reply yg menyinggung SARA (kecuali sbg otokritik)
2. Pesan yg akan direply harap dihapus, kecuali yg akan dikomentari.
3. Reading only, http://ppi-india.blogspot.com 
4. Satu email perhari: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5. No-email/web only: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6. kembali menerima email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Kirim email ke