belliottsmith commented on code in PR #4111: URL: https://github.com/apache/cassandra/pull/4111#discussion_r2100664271
########## src/java/org/apache/cassandra/exceptions/RequestTimeoutException.java: ########## @@ -40,4 +40,13 @@ protected RequestTimeoutException(ExceptionCode code, ConsistencyLevel consisten this.received = received; this.blockFor = blockFor; } + + // TODO (review): Was there an intentional choice here that RequestTimeoutException doesn't wrap its causes for brevity? Review Comment: Maybe? This gets reported to the client I think, so it may be how we prevent leaking internal server information. This behaviour has been around for a long time anyway, I think. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: pr-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: pr-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: pr-h...@cassandra.apache.org