belliottsmith commented on code in PR #4111:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cassandra/pull/4111#discussion_r2100664271


##########
src/java/org/apache/cassandra/exceptions/RequestTimeoutException.java:
##########
@@ -40,4 +40,13 @@ protected RequestTimeoutException(ExceptionCode code, 
ConsistencyLevel consisten
         this.received = received;
         this.blockFor = blockFor;
     }
+
+    // TODO (review): Was there an intentional choice here that 
RequestTimeoutException doesn't wrap its causes for brevity?

Review Comment:
   Maybe? This gets reported to the client I think, so it may be how we prevent 
leaking internal server information. This behaviour has been around for a long 
time anyway, I think.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: pr-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: pr-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: pr-h...@cassandra.apache.org

Reply via email to