On 5/8/12 7:24 PM, Yoshiro YONEYA wrote: > Dear all, > > This message starts two weeks Working Group Last Call (WGLC) on > draft-ietf-precis-problem-statement-05.txt (Stringprep Revision > Problem Statement).
Overall I think this document is in good shape. I have a few small comments. 1. In the Introduction, I think it would be useful to explain a bit more clearly the difference between an inclusion-based approach (only the codepoints that are explicitly included will be allowed) and an exclusion-based approach (all codepoints are allowed unless explicitly excluded). There's text about this in Section 4.2.4, so perhaps we could simply move that up. 2. Section 4.2.2 quotes UAX15. To provide a bit more context for the statement about NFKC perhaps not being appropriate for comparing human names, I suggest adding a sentence like the following after that quote: "In general, it can be said that NFKC is more aggressive about finding matches between codepoints than NFC." 3. In Section 4.2.2, spell out "LDH" on first use (and perhaps cite one of the DNS specs on the topic). 4. Section 5 states that "Recommendations for handling protocol incompatibilities resulting from changes to Unicode are required", but it seems to me that this is a matter for application protocols that use the replacement for stringprep, not the replacement itself. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ _______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
