On 5/9/12 3:25 AM, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Hi! Here is my review of the document. I think it is is in pretty good > shape, I have one major concern but I'm sure it can be resolved. > > /Simon > > MAJOR: > > *) Section 4.3.4 specify three classes of strings. As a naive reader > that tries to read this document as an introduction, I cannot really > follow how you got to those three categories from the rest of the > document. Are you trying to match the identifier types discussed in > 4.1.1? If so, I don't think the names are very well chosen. I think > some more motivational text around how you get to these categories > would be useful. They appear to be quite guiding of you form the rest > of the technical work (compare appendix A/B).
Hi Simon, Yes, I think it might be better to let the framework document make an argument for those three string classes, rather than put it in the problem statement. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ _______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
