On 10 maj 2012, at 03:50, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > I'm almost finished with the codepoint table. Basically my process has > been to copy over the codepoint table from RFC 5892 and update it in > accordance with the new PRECIS rules and Unicode 6.1 UnicodeData.txt. > While completing this work, I realize it would have been very helpful > for the IDNA table to contain a column describing the reason for each > assignment (e.g., codepoints 1100..115F are DISALLOWED in IDNA2008 > because they trigger the OldHangulJamo (I) rule). This is more work for > the person making the codepoint table (c'est moi), but it provides > better traceability, so I am thinking about adding this information to > the PRECIS codepoint table. Let me know if you have concerns. :)
Note that the table in 5892 is non-normative. Similar derived lists exists for the latest version of Unicode at IANA. One should really not "copy a table", but instead use the algorithm specified. If you do, then you would directly see what the reason is for the derived property value. You can also have a look at http://stupid.domain.name/idna Patrik _______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
