On 5/9/12 10:35 PM, Patrik Fältström wrote: > > On 10 maj 2012, at 03:50, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > >> I'm almost finished with the codepoint table. Basically my process >> has been to copy over the codepoint table from RFC 5892 and update >> it in accordance with the new PRECIS rules and Unicode 6.1 >> UnicodeData.txt. While completing this work, I realize it would >> have been very helpful for the IDNA table to contain a column >> describing the reason for each assignment (e.g., codepoints >> 1100..115F are DISALLOWED in IDNA2008 because they trigger the >> OldHangulJamo (I) rule). This is more work for the person making >> the codepoint table (c'est moi), but it provides better >> traceability, so I am thinking about adding this information to the >> PRECIS codepoint table. Let me know if you have concerns. :) > > Note that the table in 5892 is non-normative. Similar derived lists > exists for the latest version of Unicode at IANA. One should really > not "copy a table", but instead use the algorithm specified.
I copied it as a way to get started, rather than starting from scratch. > If you > do, then you would directly see what the reason is for the derived > property value. > > You can also have a look at http://stupid.domain.name/idna Thanks! Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ _______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
